Effects of clinical reanalysis in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry reports

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridTuna, Filiz/0000-0002-9563-8028
dc.authorwosidKABAYEL, Derya DEMIRBAG/AAB-3712-2021
dc.authorwosidtuna, filiz/ABD-4110-2020
dc.authorwosidYavuz, Selçuk/G-5201-2016
dc.contributor.authorTuna, Filiz
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Selcuk
dc.contributor.authorKabayel, Derya Demirbag
dc.contributor.authorSarikaya, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:51:36Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:51:36Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aims to assess poor positioning rates of patients during X-ray and the accuracy of the analysis. Patients and methods: In this study, we reanalyzed 323 dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) reports, by evaluating the scan images for proper patient positioning and scan analysis. We reviewed reports, according to a checklist prepared considering the proposals of Watts and The International Society for Clinical Densitometry official positions for 2013 (which were the same as in 2015). At least two remaining vertebrae were used to derive new bone mineral density and new T-scores. Results: Positioning failures were found in 64.7% of the spine X-rays, 60.5% of the hip X-rays, and 83.9% of X-rays of both regions. A total of 112 (34.7%) spinal DXA images needed new T-score adjustments. T-scores and bone mineral density differed between the first reports and the clinician reanalysis (p<0.001). Conclusion: The error rate in DXA reports was higher than expected. Clinician analysis of DXA reports are important. To obtain a quality DXA report, all healthcare professionals should be trained and reminded about this topic.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5606/tftrd.2017.595
dc.identifier.endpage206en_US
dc.identifier.issn2587-0823
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31453455en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85029716840en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage201en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid257237en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2017.595
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/257237
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/18411
dc.identifier.volume63en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000422787600001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBaycinar Medical Publ-Baycinar Tibbi Yayinciliken_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal Of Physical Medicine And Rehabilitationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnalysisen_US
dc.subjectDual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometryen_US
dc.subjectErrorsen_US
dc.subjectPositioningen_US
dc.subjectBone-Mineral Densityen_US
dc.subjectDxaen_US
dc.subjectOsteoporosisen_US
dc.subjectDensitometryen_US
dc.subjectHipen_US
dc.titleEffects of clinical reanalysis in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry reportsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu