Bilmenoğlu, ÇağlarAteş, GökçenIdemen, Aliye CerenGeçkili, OnurÇilingir, AltuğBural, CananBilhan, Hakan2024-06-122024-06-1220211300-77342146-8966https://doi.org/10.5336/dentalsci.2020-74735https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/454286https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/13490Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the invitro effects of improper implant insertion on the primary stability. Material and Methods: 75 dental implants were inserted 1.5 mm abovethe crestal level on 5 bovine bone ribs. At this stage, resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and periotest values were measured. Subsequently, the implants were fully placed. RFA and periotestmeasurements were repeated. The differences between 2 measurementsfor RFA and periotest was statistically analyzed with paired sample ttest. The correlation between the ISQ and periotest values were analyzed using Pearson correlation test at a significance level of p<0.05.Results: The primary stability of fully installed implants were found tobe significantly higher than that of the improperly inserted implantsboth in terms of ISQ and periotest values (p<0.01). Conclusion: Thefindings of this in vitro study indicate that it is impossible to achieveperfect primary stability with implants in cases where they are improperly inserted in their recipient sites. As such, a drawback is most likelyto occur when flapless surgery is preferred, it may therefore be advisedto adopt more accurate and precise techniquesen10.5336/dentalsci.2020-74735info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCan Implant Positioning Errors be Detected by Primary Stability Measurements?Article27115454286