Öztürk E.Mesut A.Carus A.2024-06-122024-06-1220169.78151E+12https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU.2016.7495712https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/1633324th Signal Processing and Communication Application Conference, SIU 2016 -- 16 May 2016 through 19 May 2016 -- -- 122605In this study, the performances of JPEG (the most widely used lossy image compression standard until it was published in 1992), JPEG2000 (designed to provide superior image quality at low bit rates) and JPEG XR (aimed to reach the speed of JPEG and the quality of JPEG2000) are evaluated with an application developed in C# language which is able to use different codecs. The results show that recently developed JPEG standard (JPEG XR) is able to compress images with the same quality as JPEG2000, but not the same speed as JPEG. © 2016 IEEE.tr10.1109/SIU.2016.7495712info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessJpeg; Jpeg Xr; Jpeg2000; Lossy Image CompressionImage Compression; Signal Processing; Image Compression Standards; Jpeg; Jpeg 2000; Jpeg Standards; Jpeg Xr; Lossy Image Compression; Low Bit Rate; Performance Comparison; Digital Image StorageConference Object2012042-s2.0-84982821497N/A