Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris from Curved Root Canal Filling Removal Using 5 Nickel-Titanium Systems

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridüstün, yakup/0000-0002-9290-5661
dc.authoridEr, Özgür/0000-0002-4999-5104
dc.authoridSen, Ozgur Genc/0000-0002-3864-9310
dc.authorwosidüstün, yakup/AAF-2749-2019
dc.authorwosidEr, Özgür/A-4734-2018
dc.authorwosidÇanakçı, Burhan Can/AGV-8520-2022
dc.authorwosidSen, Ozgur Genc/M-5939-2019
dc.contributor.authorCanakci, Burhan Can
dc.contributor.authorUstun, Yakup
dc.contributor.authorEr, Ozgur
dc.contributor.authorSen, Ozgur Genc
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:52:17Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:52:17Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study evaluated the amount of apically extruded debris in the retreatment of curved root canals using different nickel-titanium (NiTi) systems: the ProTaper Universal Retreatment (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Mtwo Retreatment (VDW, Munich, Germany), D-Race Retreatment (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland), R-Endo Re treatment (Micro-Mega, Besancon, France), and Reciproc (VDW) systems. Methods: One hundred human mandibular premolars with curved root canals were prepared with the Reciproc #25. 08 NiTi system filled with AN Plus Jet (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) sealer and gutta-percha and divided into 5 groups (n = 20). The canal filling was removed with the Pro Taper, Mtwo, D-Race, and R-Endo retreatment systems and Reciproc instruments. Final preparation was done with the Reciproc #40.06 NiTi system. Extruded debris was collected in preweighed Eppendorf tubes. The times required for retreatment were recorded. Results: Reciproc produced significantly (P <.001) more debris than the other systems. ProTaper R and Mtwo R produced significantly (P <.001) more debris than D-Race and R-Endo. The Reciproc group required significantly (P <.001) less preparation time than the other groups. Conclusions: In the retreatment of curved root canals, the Reciproc system extruded significantly more debris than the rotary retreatment NiTi systems. In addition, the ProTaper and Mtwo retreatment systems extruded significantly more debris than the R Endo and D -Race systems. The Reciproc system was significantly faster than the rotary retreatment systems.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.012
dc.identifier.endpage1104en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27179592en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84969974065en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1101en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.012
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/18664
dc.identifier.volume42en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000378981700017en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectApical Extrusionen_US
dc.subjectDebris Extrusionen_US
dc.subjectEndodontic Retreatmenten_US
dc.subjectNitien_US
dc.subjectGutta-Percha Removalen_US
dc.subjectProtaper Universal Rotaryen_US
dc.subjectSingle-File Systemsen_US
dc.subjectHand Filesen_US
dc.subjectInstrumentation Techniquesen_US
dc.subjectRetreatment Systemen_US
dc.subjectNiti Instrumentsen_US
dc.subjectShaping Abilityen_US
dc.subjectExtracted Teethen_US
dc.subjectFlare-Upsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Apically Extruded Debris from Curved Root Canal Filling Removal Using 5 Nickel-Titanium Systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu