Seasonal affective disorder in eight groups in Turkey

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridElbi, Hayriye/0000-0003-3651-4292
dc.authoridUnal, Suheyla/0000-0003-3266-6256
dc.authoridUnal, Suheyla/0000-0003-3266-6256
dc.authoridUNAL, SERHAT/0000-0003-1184-4711
dc.authoridKorukoglu, Serdar/0000-0002-4230-8447
dc.authorwosidElbi, Hayriye/AAG-4315-2019
dc.authorwosidUnal, Suheyla/HJH-7559-2023
dc.authorwosidKumbasar, Hakan/AAQ-3617-2020
dc.authorwosidkorukoglu, serdar/AAF-8089-2020
dc.authorwosidUnal, Suheyla/JVO-8367-2024
dc.authorwosidUNAL, SERHAT/I-9034-2013
dc.contributor.authorElbi, H
dc.contributor.authorNoyan, A
dc.contributor.authorKorukoglu, S
dc.contributor.authorÜnal, S
dc.contributor.authorBekaroglu, M
dc.contributor.authorOguzhanoglu, N
dc.contributor.authorTürköz, N
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:13:52Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:13:52Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Previous estimates of the prevalence of seasonal affective disorder (SAD) in community-based samples generally originated from western countries. We report prevalence rates in eight groups from four latitudes in Turkey. Method: Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ) was distributed to the community-based samples from eight different locations at four latitudes in Turkey. The prevalence rates of winter SAD and subsyndromal SAD (S-SAD) were estimated for the four groups at the same latitudes by using SPAQ responses. Results: We distributed 3229 SPAQs, had an overall response rate of 54.16% and 1749 SPAQs were included in the analyses. Seasonality was reported as a problem by 549 subjects (31.57%) of our 1749 respondents. Prevalence of winter SAD and S-SAD are estimated as 4.86 and 8.35%, respectively, for the whole group. Prevalence rates were determined for each center and for four latitudes (two centers at the same latitude were grouped as one). In Adana-Gaziantep (It. 37), Izmir-Elazig (It. 38), Eskisehir-Ankara (it. 39) and Trabzon-Edirne (it. 41), the prevalence rates for winter SAD were 6.66, 2.25, 8.00 and 3.76%, respectively. Conclusions: Our prevalence estimates of winter SAD are similar to those found in previous community-based studies at the same latitudes; no correlation was found between latitude and prevalence of winter SAD, which could be related to the sampling methodology or to the fact that there were only 5degrees of difference between the latitudes. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00332-9
dc.identifier.endpage84en_US
dc.identifier.issn0165-0327
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid12113922en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0036020022en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage77en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00332-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/23690
dc.identifier.volume70en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000177024900008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Bven_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Affective Disordersen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSADen_US
dc.subjectWinter Depressionen_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.subjectLatitudeen_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectPattern-Assessment-Questionnaireen_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectMooden_US
dc.subjectDepressionen_US
dc.subjectBehavioren_US
dc.subjectLatitudeen_US
dc.subjectSpaqen_US
dc.titleSeasonal affective disorder in eight groups in Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu