Comparison of denture base adaptation between additive and conventional fabrication techniques

dc.authoridBilmenoglu, Caglar/0000-0002-2580-9899
dc.authorwosidBilmenoglu, Caglar/HGE-5706-2022
dc.contributor.authorTosun, Osman Nuri
dc.contributor.authorBilmenoglu, Caglar
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Ali Kemal
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:50:40Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:50:40Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurposeThis in vitro study compared the adaptation of denture bases fabricated by injection molding (IM), compression molding (CM), liquid crystal display (LCD), and digital light processing (DLP) techniques. Material and methodsA definitive maxillary cast was duplicated using a silicone mold to create 40 gypsum casts that were laser scanned before any fabrication procedures were initiated. For the DLP and LCD groups, 20 denture bases (10 in each group) were virtually designed and manufactured referring to the digitalized data. For the CM and IM groups, 20 denture bases (10 in each group) were molded using gypsum models. A total of 40 gypsum models and their corresponding denture bases were scanned. The scanned intaglio surface of each denture base was superimposed on the scanned reference cast to compare the degree of tissue surface adaptation. The three-dimensional surface deviations of the total intaglio surface, denture border apex, palatal vault, and crest of the ridge were evaluated on the basis of the best fit algorithm technique using inspection software. The data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test (alpha = 0.05). ResultsAccording to the superimposing results, for the total intaglio surface, the lowest deviation was present on the injection-molded group and the highest deviation occurred on the LCD group. For the palatal vault, the lowest deviation was present on the DLP group and the highest deviation occurred in the compression molded group. For the crest of the ridge, the lowest deviation was present in the injection-molded group and the highest deviation occurred in the LCD group. For the denture border apex, the lowest deviation was present in the DLP group and the highest deviation occurred in the LCD group. ConclusionsMaxillary denture bases fabricated using DLP and IM techniques showed higher surface adaptation than the bases fabricated using LCD and CM techniques. Among the conventional techniques, higher compatible dentures can be produced with IM; among the additive techniques, higher compatible dentures can be produced with DLP.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch Fund of Trakya University; [2021/50]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipACKNOWLEDGMENT The work was supported by the Research Fund of Trakya University (Project No. 2021/50).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jopr.13623
dc.identifier.endpageE70en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36495146en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85145412658en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE64en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13623
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/18086
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000905650400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic And Reconstructive Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdditive Techniquesen_US
dc.subjectDenture Baseen_US
dc.subjectDigital Light Processingen_US
dc.subjectLiquid Crystal Displayen_US
dc.subjectThree-Dimensional Printingen_US
dc.subjectCad-Camen_US
dc.subjectAccuracyen_US
dc.titleComparison of denture base adaptation between additive and conventional fabrication techniquesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar