Intravenous regional anesthesia using prilocaine and neostigmine
dc.contributor.author | Turan, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Karamanlioglu, B | |
dc.contributor.author | Memis, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Kaya, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Pamukçu, Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-12T11:19:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-12T11:19:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | |
dc.department | Trakya Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Neostigmine has been added to local anesthetics for central and peripheral nerve blocks resulting in prolonged, increased anesthesia and improved analgesia. We conducted this study to evaluate the effects of neostigmine when added to prilocaine for IV regional anesthesia (IVRA). Thirty patients undergoing hand surgery were randomly assigned to two groups to receive IVRA. The control group received 1 mL of saline plus 3 mg/kg of prilocaine diluted with saline to a total dose of 40 mL; the study group received 0.5 mg of neostigmine plus 3 mg/kg of prilocaine diluted with saline to a total dose of 40 mL. Sensory and motor block onset and recovery, anesthesia quality determined by an anesthesiologist, anesthesia quality determined by a surgeon, and dryness of the operative field were noted. Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, and oxygen saturation values were noted at 1, 5, 10, 20, and 40 min before surgery and after tourniquet release. Time to first analgesic requirement was also noted. Shortened sensory and motor block onset times, prolonged sensory and motor block recovery times, improved quality of anesthesia, and prolonged time to first analgesic requirement were found in the neostigmine group. We conclude that neostigmine as an adjunct to prilocaine improves quality of anesthesia and is beneficial in IVRA. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/00000539-200211000-00058 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 1422 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-2999 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 12401636 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-0036828467 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1419 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200211000-00058 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/25287 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 95 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000178912600058 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Anesthesia And Analgesia | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Postoperative Analgesia | en_US |
dc.subject | Peripheral Analgesia | en_US |
dc.subject | Dose-Response | en_US |
dc.subject | Acetylcholine | en_US |
dc.subject | Morphine | en_US |
dc.subject | Nerve | en_US |
dc.subject | Block | en_US |
dc.title | Intravenous regional anesthesia using prilocaine and neostigmine | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |