The impact of nutritional risk screening 2002 and subjective global assessment upon prognosis for intensive care patients

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridUzundere, Osman/0000-0002-5968-4561
dc.authoridGultekin, Ahmet/0000-0003-4570-8339
dc.authorwosidUzundere, Osman/ABC-7711-2020
dc.authorwosidGultekin, Ahmet/ABA-7274-2020
dc.contributor.authorGultekin, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorMemis, Dilek
dc.contributor.authorInal, Mehmet Turan
dc.contributor.authorUzundere, Osman
dc.contributor.authorTuran, F. Nesrin
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:08:08Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:08:08Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAims: The assessment of nutritional status aims to specify individuals and communities that are malnourished or under malnutrition risk, to develop healthcare programs aimed at meeting society's needs in the wake of the assessment. Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) 2002 is assessed for intensive care patients, it turns out to be indicative of their prognosis simply and effectively. Methods: The age, weight, body mass index (BMI), APACHE II, SOFA score, biochemical parameters (albumin, prealbumin, total lymphocyte levels), triceps thickness from anthropometric measurements were recorded during the hospitalization process. The patients were classified as nutritionally risk (NRS2002 +) or nutritionally risk-free (NRS2002 -) after NRS2002 assessment. According to SGD, the patients were categorized as well-fed (SGD-A), slightly or moderately malnourished (SGD-B), and heavy malnourished (SGD-C). The nutritional changes in the patient were categorized as NRS2002 -/SGD A (good nutrition), NRS2002 +/SGD B (slight or moderate malnutrition), or NRS2002 -/SGD C (severe malnutrition). Results: It is found that 49,8% of the patients were in the well-fed group, 42,2% of them in the slightly-moderately malnourished group, and 8% of them in the heavy-malnourished group. While the rate of malnutrition increases as the patients' age increases, and as their weight and BMI decrease, albumin, prealbumin, total lymphocyte, triceps skinfold thickness values decrease as malnutrition increases. For the patients with higher malnutrition rate, the duration of stay in the intensive care unit and mechanic ventilators and the mortality rate increase. Conclusions: We found that mortality increased with malnutrition. The nutritional status should be followed, and a treatment plan should be drawn up in critical care patients. Thus; SGA, NRS 2002 and other objective methods for assessing nutritional status with high sensitivity and specivity can be recommended for evaluation of critically ill patients.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage55en_US
dc.identifier.issn1129-8723
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85016322902en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage47en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/22292
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000373213000008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMattioli 1885en_US
dc.relation.ispartofProgress In Nutritionen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMalnutritionen_US
dc.subjectIntensive Careen_US
dc.subjectNutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002)en_US
dc.subjectSubjective Global Assessment (SGD)en_US
dc.subjectCritically-Ill Patientsen_US
dc.subjectHospitalized-Patientsen_US
dc.subjectClinical-Outcomesen_US
dc.subjectMalnutritionen_US
dc.subjectAssociationen_US
dc.subjectKnowledgeen_US
dc.subjectMortalityen_US
dc.subjectSupporten_US
dc.subjectSystemen_US
dc.titleThe impact of nutritional risk screening 2002 and subjective global assessment upon prognosis for intensive care patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu