In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetration
dc.authorid | Arısu, Hacer Deniz/0000-0003-0249-8968 | |
dc.authorid | Özyurt, Esra/0000-0003-4118-0450 | |
dc.authorwosid | Arısu, Hacer Deniz/AAD-9478-2019 | |
dc.authorwosid | Özyurt, Esra/AAD-5096-2021 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozyurt, Esra | |
dc.contributor.author | Arisu, Hacer Deniz | |
dc.contributor.author | Turkoz, Emin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-12T10:59:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-12T10:59:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.department | Trakya Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the dentin tubule penetration effectiveness of a dental adhesive and a resin infiltration system used with two different surface treatments. Methods: Dentin specimens were obtained from 42 impacted lower right wisdom tooth, 2 of these specimens were used to detect the effects of surface treatments. Two different surface treatments (37% phosphoric acid and 17% EDTA) were applied to the samples to compare the dentin tubule penetration effectiveness of a dental adhesive -which had been using for treatment of dentin hypersensitivity - and a resin infiltration system. Scanning electron microscopy was used to investigate the tubule penetration effectiveness. For statistical analysis, Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U and One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests were used. Results: ICON had shown significantly more resin penetration intensity and more resin penetration depth than Adper Single Bond 2 (p<0.05). Phosphoric acid treatment groups had shown significantly more penetration intensity than EDTA treated groups (p=0.001). Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it can be concluded that tubuler penetration effectivenes of ICON resin infiltration system is better than Adper Single Bond 2 adhesive system. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.599847 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 260 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2459-1459 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 253 | en_US |
dc.identifier.trdizinid | 375645 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.599847 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/375645 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/20394 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000493400900010 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Marmara Univ, Inst Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical And Experimental Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Dentin Sensitivity | en_US |
dc.subject | Resins | en_US |
dc.subject | Adhesives | en_US |
dc.subject | Microscopy | en_US |
dc.subject | Bonding Systems | en_US |
dc.subject | Hypersensitivity | en_US |
dc.subject | Strength | en_US |
dc.subject | Lesions | en_US |
dc.subject | Edta | en_US |
dc.title | In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetration | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |