In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetration

dc.authoridArısu, Hacer Deniz/0000-0003-0249-8968
dc.authoridÖzyurt, Esra/0000-0003-4118-0450
dc.authorwosidArısu, Hacer Deniz/AAD-9478-2019
dc.authorwosidÖzyurt, Esra/AAD-5096-2021
dc.contributor.authorOzyurt, Esra
dc.contributor.authorArisu, Hacer Deniz
dc.contributor.authorTurkoz, Emin
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:59:21Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:59:21Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the dentin tubule penetration effectiveness of a dental adhesive and a resin infiltration system used with two different surface treatments. Methods: Dentin specimens were obtained from 42 impacted lower right wisdom tooth, 2 of these specimens were used to detect the effects of surface treatments. Two different surface treatments (37% phosphoric acid and 17% EDTA) were applied to the samples to compare the dentin tubule penetration effectiveness of a dental adhesive -which had been using for treatment of dentin hypersensitivity - and a resin infiltration system. Scanning electron microscopy was used to investigate the tubule penetration effectiveness. For statistical analysis, Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U and One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests were used. Results: ICON had shown significantly more resin penetration intensity and more resin penetration depth than Adper Single Bond 2 (p<0.05). Phosphoric acid treatment groups had shown significantly more penetration intensity than EDTA treated groups (p=0.001). Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it can be concluded that tubuler penetration effectivenes of ICON resin infiltration system is better than Adper Single Bond 2 adhesive system.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.33808/clinexphealthsci.599847
dc.identifier.endpage260en_US
dc.identifier.issn2459-1459
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage253en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid375645en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.599847
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/375645
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/20394
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000493400900010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMarmara Univ, Inst Health Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical And Experimental Health Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDentin Sensitivityen_US
dc.subjectResinsen_US
dc.subjectAdhesivesen_US
dc.subjectMicroscopyen_US
dc.subjectBonding Systemsen_US
dc.subjectHypersensitivityen_US
dc.subjectStrengthen_US
dc.subjectLesionsen_US
dc.subjectEdtaen_US
dc.titleIn Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetrationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar