Effect of lubricants on apically extruded debris and dentinal crack formation using ProTaper Next and Reciproc systems

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÇanakçı, Burhan Can
dc.contributor.authorEr, Özgür
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:05:40Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:05:40Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: We evaluated the effects of 5% NaOCl solution, 17%EDTA solution, and RC-Prep on the amount of apically extruded debris and the incidence of dentinal cracks during canalpreparation using the ProTaper Next and Reciproc systems.Materials and Methods: In total, 255 human mandibularincisors were divided into eight groups (n=30 each) and acontrol group (n=15). Teeth in groups 1 (NaOCl), 2 (EDTA),3 (RC-Prep), and 4 (EDTA+RC-Prep) were prepared usingthe ProTaper Next system, and those in groups 5 (NaOCl), 6(EDTA), 7 (RC-Prep), and 8 (EDTA+RC-Prep) were preparedusing the Reciproc system. Apical extrusion and crack formation were each examined in 15 teeth from each group. Extruded debris was collected in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. Inthe crack detection study, teeth were sectioned horizontallyat 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex. The slices were then viewedthrough a stereomicroscope at ×25 magnification.Results: Among ProTaper Next groups, the amount of debris extruded was significantly greater in group 1 (NaOCl) thanin groups 2 (EDTA), 3 (RC-Prep), and 4 (EDTA+RC-Prep; p<0.001). No significant difference was detected among groups2, 3, and 4. Among Reciproc groups, the amount of debrisextruded was significantly greater in group 5 (NaOCl) thanin groups 6 (EDTA), 7 (RC-Prep), and 8 (EDTA+RC-Prep; p<0.001). No significant difference was observed among groups6, 7, and 8. The total numbers of cracks were significantly larger in groups 1 (ProTaper – NaOCl), 3 (ProTaper – RC-Prep),5 (Reciproc – NaOCl), and 7 (Reciproc – RC-Prep) than ingroups 2 (ProTaper – EDTA), 4 (ProTaper – EDTA+RC-Prep), 6(Reciproc – EDTA), and 8 (Reciproc – EDTA+RC-Prep).Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, EDTA solution or RC-Prep causes less apical extrusion. The use of EDTAsolution produced fewer dentinal cracks, and the use of RCPrep alone did not affect.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5505/yeditepe.2018.36035
dc.identifier.endpage50en_US
dc.identifier.issn2458-9586
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage43en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid311979en_US]
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5505/yeditepe.2018.36035
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/311979
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/13578
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartof7tepe Kliniken_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleEffect of lubricants on apically extruded debris and dentinal crack formation using ProTaper Next and Reciproc systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu