Comparison of warm vertical compaction and cold lateral condensation of a, gutta-percha and resilon on apically extruded debris during retreatment
dc.authorid | Er, Özgür/0000-0002-4999-5104 | |
dc.authorwosid | Çanakçı, Burhan Can/AGV-8520-2022 | |
dc.authorwosid | Er, Özgür/A-4734-2018 | |
dc.contributor.author | Canakci, B. C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sungur, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Er, O. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-12T10:52:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-12T10:52:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.department | Trakya Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background: This study was performed to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris removed from a root canal filled with cold lateral condensation (CLC), and warm vertical compaction (WVC) techniques, using b or a phase gutta-percha with AH-Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) or Resilon (Resilon Research LLC, Madison, WI) with RealSeal SE (SybronEndo, Amersfoort, The Netherlands). Materials and Methods: About 100 human incisor teeth were prepared with a #25.06 NiTi rotary system and divided into five groups according to the filling material used: Group 1: CLC (gutta-percha, AH-Plus); Group 2: WVC (b phase gutta-percha, AH-Plus); Group 3: WVC (a phase gutta-percha, AH-Plus); Group 4: CLC (Resilon, RealSeal SE); and Group 5: WVC (Resilon, RealSeal SE). Extruded debris during the retreatment procedure was collected in preweighed Eppendorf tubes. The times required for retreatment were recorded. Results: The amount of debris extrusion was significantly greater with WVC than CLC in the gutta-percha and Resilon groups (P < 0.001). Using a phase gutta-percha resulted in significantly more debris extrusion than b phase gutta-percha (P < 0.001). In the WVC groups, Resilon caused significantly more debris extrusion than gutta-percha (P < 0.05). Retreatment was faster for CLC than WVC (P < 0.05). Conclusions: In the retreatment procedure, the amount of apically extruded debris and retreatment duration were dependent on the type of obturation material and technique used. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Trakya University Scientific Research Projects Unit with TDK [2017/101] | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Supported by Trakya University Scientific Research Projects Unit with TDK (project number 2017/101). | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4103/njcp.njcp_663_18 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 931 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1119-3077 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31293256 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85068908575 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 926 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_663_18 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/18668 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 22 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000474919400008 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Nigerian Journal Of Clinical Practice | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Apical Extrusion | en_US |
dc.subject | Warm Vertical Compaction | en_US |
dc.subject | A Phase Gutta-Percha | en_US |
dc.subject | B Phase Gutta-Percha | en_US |
dc.subject | Resilon | en_US |
dc.subject | Root Canals | en_US |
dc.subject | Bond Strength | en_US |
dc.subject | Obturation | en_US |
dc.subject | Efficacy | en_US |
dc.subject | System | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of warm vertical compaction and cold lateral condensation of a, gutta-percha and resilon on apically extruded debris during retreatment | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |