Clinical comparison of the ocular blood flow tonograph and the Goldmann applanation tonometer

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridEsgin, Haluk/0000-0002-6611-6132
dc.authorwosidEsgin, Haluk/H-6460-2013
dc.contributor.authorEsgin, H
dc.contributor.authorAlimgil, ML
dc.contributor.authorErda, S
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:02:40Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:02:40Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose. To compare the IOP readings of an ocular blood flow (OBF) tonograph (OBF Labs UK Ltd) with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Methods. 194 patients were studied. In group 1, the software version 8.2 of the OBF tonograph was used in 214 eyes of 107 patients and in group 2, the 11.2 version of the tonograph was used in 174 eyes of 87 patients. Results. We found 63% of the OBF tonograph readings to be within +/-2 mm Hg of the Goldmann applanation tonometry readings in group 1 and 60% in group 2. In group I the correlation coefficient between the readings of the two instruments was 0.71 and 0.82 in group 2. The mean value for the paired differences in group 1 was -1.34+/-2.75 mm Hg overall and -1.04+/-2.91 mm Hg overall in group 2. There was a significant difference between the Goldmann applanation tonometer and OBF tonograph readings in the 8-10 mm Hg interval (p<0.001) in group I, but not in group 2 (p>0.1). Conclusions. The 11.2 version of the OBF tonograph is more accurate than the 8.2 version and measures IOP in a manner that corresponds well to the Goldmann applanation tonometer in the 8-10 mm Hg and 21-29 mm Hg intervals. It corresponds fairly well in the 11-20 mm Hg interval.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/112067219800800308
dc.identifier.endpage166en_US
dc.identifier.issn1120-6721
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid9793770en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0031721369en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage162en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/112067219800800308
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/21375
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000077895200008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWichtig Editoreen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal Of Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGlaucomaen_US
dc.subjectIntraocular Pressureen_US
dc.subjectPulsatile Ocular Blood Flow Pneumotonographen_US
dc.subjectGoldmann Applanation Tonometeren_US
dc.titleClinical comparison of the ocular blood flow tonograph and the Goldmann applanation tonometeren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu