Comparison of effects of dry versus wet swallowing on Eustachian tube function via a nine-step inflation/deflation test

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridUZUN, CEM/0000-0003-3233-7049
dc.authorwosidUZUN, CEM/K-3307-2012
dc.contributor.authorAdali, MK
dc.contributor.authorUzun, C
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:01:33Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:01:33Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.descriptionInternational Interdisciplinary Course in Otology and Neuro-Otology -- JUN 06-08, 2004 -- Sunny Beach, BULGARIAen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of swallowing type (dry versus wet) on the outcome of a nine-step inflation/deflation tympanometric Eustachian tube function (ETF) test in healthy adults. Fourteen normal healthy volunteers, between 19 and 28 years of age, were included in the study. The nine-step test was performed in two different test procedures: (1) test with dry swallows (dry test procedure) and (2) test with liquid-swallows,(wet test procedure). If the equilibration of middle-ear (ME) pressure was successful in all the steps of the nine-step test, ETF was considered 'Good'. Otherwise, the test was considered 'Poor', and the test was repeated at a second session. In the dry test procedure, ETF was 'Good' in 21 ears at the first session and in 24 ears after the second session (p > 0.05). However, in the wet test procedure, ETF was 'Good' in 13 ears at the first session and in 21 ears after the second session (p < 0.05). At the first session, ETF was 'Good' in 21 and 13 ears in the dry and wet test procedures, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). However, after the second session, the overall number of ears with 'Good' tubal function was almost the same in both test procedures (24 ears at dry test procedures versus 21 ears at wet test procedures; p > 0.05). Dry swallowing seems to be more effective for the equilibration of ME pressure. Thus, a single-session dependent evaluation of ETF may be efficient for the dry test procedure of the nine-step test. Swallowing with water may be easier for subjects, but a repetition of the test at a second session may be necessary when the test result is 'Poor'.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1258/0022215054797970
dc.identifier.endpage708en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-2151
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.pmid16156911en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-24744435336en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage704en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1258/0022215054797970
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/20943
dc.identifier.volume119en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000232101800007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHeadley Brothers Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Laryngology And Otologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEustachian Tubeen_US
dc.subjectAcoustic Impedance Testsen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Earen_US
dc.subjectDeglutitionen_US
dc.subjectMiddle-Ear Barotraumaen_US
dc.subjectSonotubometryen_US
dc.subjectDiversen_US
dc.titleComparison of effects of dry versus wet swallowing on Eustachian tube function via a nine-step inflation/deflation testen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu