Functional results of patients treated with modular prosthetic replacement for bone tumors of the extremities
dc.authorwosid | Çiftdemir, Mert/AAH-9210-2020 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yalniz, Erol | |
dc.contributor.author | Ciftdemir, Mert | |
dc.contributor.author | Memisoglu, Serdar | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-12T10:54:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-12T10:54:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.department | Trakya Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: We evaluated functional results of patients who were treated with cemented modular prosthetic replacement for bone tumors of the extremities. Methods: The stud included 23 patients (12 males, 11 fey males mean age 49 years, range 14-81 years) who underwent wide resection and cemented endoprosthetic replacement with the TMTS (Turkish Musculoskeletal Tumor Society) prosthesis for bone tumors. Twelve patients (52.2%; mean age 63.5 years) had metastatic, 11 patients (47.8%; mean age 38 years) had primary tumors. The most common site of involvement was the femur (n=17). followed by the humerus (n=5). Functional evaluations were made with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system. The mean followup up period was 24 months (range I to 108 months), being 30 months for primary, and 3 months for metastatic tumors. Results: Postoperative complications were seen in seven patients (30.4%), being local recurrences in three patients. During the follow-up period, I I patients died due to tumoral causes, distant metastasis developed in three patients, and nine patients were tumor-free. Survival was significantly better in patients with primary tumors (p<0.001). All the patients were able to walk without crutches in the postoperative period. The mean MSTS score was 58.9% (range 40% to 90%) in survivors, which was 71.5% (range 60% to 90%) for primary tumors, and 47.4% (range 40% to 73%) for metastatic tumors (p<0.001). Conclusion: Reconstruction with cemented modular endoprostheses is an appropriate surgical alternative in the treatment of large segmental defects after resection of extremity tumors, with satisfactory functional results particularly in primary tumors. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3944/AOTT.2008.238 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 245 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1017-995X | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19060517 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 238 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2008.238 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/19242 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 42 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000262112900005 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | tr | en_US |
dc.publisher | Turkish Assoc Orthopaedics Traumatology | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Bone Neoplasms/Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | Femoral Neoplasms | en_US |
dc.subject | Limb Salvaged Prostheses And Implants | en_US |
dc.subject | Reconstructive Surgical Procedures/Methods | en_US |
dc.subject | Survival Rate | en_US |
dc.subject | Limb Salvage | en_US |
dc.subject | Endoprosthetic Replacement | en_US |
dc.subject | Malignant-Tumor | en_US |
dc.subject | Distal End | en_US |
dc.subject | Follow-Up | en_US |
dc.subject | Femur | en_US |
dc.subject | Osteosarcoma | en_US |
dc.subject | Long | en_US |
dc.subject | Sarcoma | en_US |
dc.subject | Reconstructions | en_US |
dc.title | Functional results of patients treated with modular prosthetic replacement for bone tumors of the extremities | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |