Evaluation of the quality, reliability, and popularity of Turkish YouTube videos on acne treatment

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridSarikaya Solak, Sezgi/0000-0002-8572-8249
dc.authoridKaya, özge/0000-0001-8062-1664
dc.authorwosidSarikaya Solak, Sezgi/A-4789-2016
dc.authorwosidKaya, özge/GWZ-2582-2022
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Ozge
dc.contributor.authorSolak, Sezgi Sarikaya
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:50:28Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:50:28Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground and Design: Social media is extremely popular for obtaining information on dermatological diseases and their treatments. The present study aimed to evaluate Turkish YouTube videos on acne treatment and compare them in terms of quality, reliability, and popularity based on the upload source.Materials and Methods: The first 120 Turkish YouTube videos on acne treatments were reviewed. The number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, video age, and video length were recorded. The quality and reliability of the videos were evaluated with the video power index (VPI). Then, the findings were compared based on the upload source.Results: A total of 104 videos uploaded by 52 physicians and 52 non-physicians (female: male ratio: 3.3:1) were assessed in this study. The DISCERN Score and Global Quality Score (GQS) were higher in the physicians' group (n=52, 50%) (p<0.001). The number of views, likes, dislikes, comments and VPI were significantly higher in the non-physicians group. The time elapsed since the upload day was longer in the videos uploaded by physicians, and the video duration was longer in the videos uploaded by non-physicians (p<0.001). The DISCERN and GQS in videos uploaded by dermatologists (n=30, 54%) were higher (p<0.001) than in those uploaded by non-dermatologists (n=22, 46%). No statistically significant difference was found in other findings.Conclusion: This study's findings confirmed that Turkish YouTube videos on acne treatment uploaded by doctors, especially dermatologists, were of higher quality and reliable, albeit with lower viewing rates and popularity.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/turkderm.galenos.2022.09623
dc.identifier.endpage171en_US
dc.identifier.issn2717-6398
dc.identifier.issn2651-5164
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85148673062en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage166en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1169952en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/turkderm.galenos.2022.09623
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1169952
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/17993
dc.identifier.volume56en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000914669700004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGalenos Publ Houseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkderm-Turkish Archives Of Dermatology And Venerologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAcne Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectSocial Mediaen_US
dc.subjectYoutubeen_US
dc.subjectImpacten_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the quality, reliability, and popularity of Turkish YouTube videos on acne treatmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu