Does Implant-Abutment Interface affect Marginal Bone Levels around Implants?
dc.authorscopusid | 36154378000 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 57209529292 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 57209531108 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 14012620400 | |
dc.contributor.author | Elemek E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Urgancioglu A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dincer J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cilingir A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-12T10:25:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-12T10:25:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective The use of dental implants with different types of surface roughness and implant-abutment interface has brought about a situation of marginal bone loss. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze and compare marginal bone levels of different types of osseointegrated dental implants with platform switch (Group A: Ankylos, Mannheim, Germany) and platform match (Group B: Dentsply Xive, Mannheim, Germany, and Group C: MIS Implant Technologies, Karmiel, Israel). Materials and Methods One hundred and seven patients (52 men and 55 women) with a mean age of 54.79 (standard deviation ± 12.35) years and a total of 321 dental implants (Group A, n = 198; Group B, n = 58; and Group C, n = 65) placed in a private practice between April 2006 and May 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. In addition to demographic information and implant characteristics, marginal bone levels were evaluated by Image J (Wayne Rasband, National Institute of Health, Maryland) program. Results The mean age of all patients was 54.79 ± 12.35 years, and 51.5% of them were women. Implants supporting fixed bridge were most commonly used in all groups (65%), whereas only 20% were restored with a single crown and 15% with overdentures. In total, 47.5% of all implants showed no marginal bone loss. Mean bone loss in Group A was significantly lower (0.81 ± 1.60 mm) as compared to Group B (1.58 ± 1.59 mm) and Group C (1.18 ± 1.36) (p < 0.005). Conclusion Among different types of dental implants, platform switch seems to preserve marginal bone levels and increase the long-term success of dental implants. © 2019 Dental Investigation Society. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1055/s-0039-1688538 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 52 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1305-7456 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85068048821 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 47 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688538 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/16229 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 13 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Journal of Dentistry | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Implant; Marginal Bone Loss; Platform Match; Platform Switch | en_US |
dc.title | Does Implant-Abutment Interface affect Marginal Bone Levels around Implants? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |