Does Implant-Abutment Interface affect Marginal Bone Levels around Implants?

dc.authorscopusid36154378000
dc.authorscopusid57209529292
dc.authorscopusid57209531108
dc.authorscopusid14012620400
dc.contributor.authorElemek E.
dc.contributor.authorUrgancioglu A.
dc.contributor.authorDincer J.
dc.contributor.authorCilingir A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:25:11Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:25:11Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractObjective The use of dental implants with different types of surface roughness and implant-abutment interface has brought about a situation of marginal bone loss. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze and compare marginal bone levels of different types of osseointegrated dental implants with platform switch (Group A: Ankylos, Mannheim, Germany) and platform match (Group B: Dentsply Xive, Mannheim, Germany, and Group C: MIS Implant Technologies, Karmiel, Israel). Materials and Methods One hundred and seven patients (52 men and 55 women) with a mean age of 54.79 (standard deviation ± 12.35) years and a total of 321 dental implants (Group A, n = 198; Group B, n = 58; and Group C, n = 65) placed in a private practice between April 2006 and May 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. In addition to demographic information and implant characteristics, marginal bone levels were evaluated by Image J (Wayne Rasband, National Institute of Health, Maryland) program. Results The mean age of all patients was 54.79 ± 12.35 years, and 51.5% of them were women. Implants supporting fixed bridge were most commonly used in all groups (65%), whereas only 20% were restored with a single crown and 15% with overdentures. In total, 47.5% of all implants showed no marginal bone loss. Mean bone loss in Group A was significantly lower (0.81 ± 1.60 mm) as compared to Group B (1.58 ± 1.59 mm) and Group C (1.18 ± 1.36) (p < 0.005). Conclusion Among different types of dental implants, platform switch seems to preserve marginal bone levels and increase the long-term success of dental implants. © 2019 Dental Investigation Society.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/s-0039-1688538
dc.identifier.endpage52en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-7456
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85068048821en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage47en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688538
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/16229
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGeorg Thieme Verlagen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectImplant; Marginal Bone Loss; Platform Match; Platform Switchen_US
dc.titleDoes Implant-Abutment Interface affect Marginal Bone Levels around Implants?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar