The trunk control: Which scale is the best in very acute stroke patients?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridadın, rıdvan muhammed/0000-0002-8390-1386;
dc.authorwosidÇetin, Barış/JAO-3292-2023
dc.authorwosidadın, rıdvan muhammed/AAD-3569-2020
dc.authorwosidFIL, AYLA/J-1181-2013
dc.contributor.authorBalkan, Ayla Fil
dc.contributor.authorSalci, Yeliz
dc.contributor.authorKeklicek, Hilal
dc.contributor.authorCetin, Baris
dc.contributor.authorAdin, Ridvan Muhammed
dc.contributor.authorArmutlu, Kadriye
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:17:05Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:17:05Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: It is important to evaluate trunk control, given that it is one of the indicators of adequate functional and motor recovery in patients following a stroke. The assessment should be feasible and adequate in clinical conditions in the acute phase.Objectives: The aim of this study was to detect the most appropriate scale used for trunk control assessment in very acute stroke patients in terms of time and ease of implementation.Methods: Sixty-five patients with very acute stroke were included in the study. The patients were assessed with the Trunk Impairment Scale-1 (VTIS), the Trunk Impairment Scale-2 (FTIS), the Motor Assessment Scale trunk subscale (T-MAS) and the Trunk Control Test (TCT), and Functional Impairment Measure (FIM). Floor/ceiling effects, reliability, validity responsiveness of all trunk control scales analyzed. The correlation between all scales and FIM were calculated.Results: All scales had similar reliability, responsiveness and construct validity level. T-MAS and TCT were more advantageous than other scales according to time. TCT and VTIS showed floor effect. The best predictive validity values were observed for the T-MAS and TCT.Conclusions: Four scales investigated in this study can also be used to evaluate the patients with very acute stroke. On the other hand, the advantages and disadvantages of the scales should be thoroughly assessed and researchers can use one of four scales considering their aim, patient populations and clinical characteristics of patientsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10749357.2019.1607994
dc.identifier.endpage365en_US
dc.identifier.issn1074-9357
dc.identifier.issn1945-5119
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31044664en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85065416576en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage359en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2019.1607994
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/24573
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000471384700001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofTopics In Stroke Rehabilitationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectVery Acute Strokeen_US
dc.subjectTrunk Controlen_US
dc.subjectAssessmenten_US
dc.subjectScaleen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectFunctional Independence Measureen_US
dc.subjectImpairment Scaleen_US
dc.subjectMotor Impairmenten_US
dc.subjectItalian Versionen_US
dc.subjectEarly Predictoren_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectRecoveryen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectMobilityen_US
dc.titleThe trunk control: Which scale is the best in very acute stroke patients?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu