Is success objective or subjective in knee prosthesis?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridÖzcan, Mert/0000-0002-2009-1881
dc.authorwosidYILMAZ, BARIS/A-1070-2018
dc.authorwosidÖzcan, Mert/AFT-4413-2022
dc.contributor.authorCopuroglu, Cem
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Mert
dc.contributor.authorAykac, Bilal
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Baris
dc.contributor.authorYalniz, Erol
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:07:24Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:07:24Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To analyze the relation between the radiological and functional results and satisfaction of the knee prosthesis. Material and Methods: In this study, knee prosthesis applied to 43 patients' 76 knees were retrospectively evaluated. As a radiologic parameter; anatomical alignment, and as a functional measurement; range of motion was evaluated. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was measured as a pain score. The relation of functional and radiological measurements with VAS scores was analyzed. All the patients were re-evaluated with Oxford knee score. Results: Study group included 37 women and 6 men with a mean age of 63 (26-76). A total number of 76 knees (33 bilateral, 10 unilateral) were evaluated. Mean follow up time was 16.25 months (2-29 months). In the last evaluation; according to the preoperative evaluation, varus deformity improved, functional improvement could not be gained and VAS decreased, in 23 knees. In 21 knees, no radiological and functional improvement could be gained, VAS decreased. In 13 knees, no radiological difference was obtained, functions got worse, VAS decreased. In 3 knees, no radiological difference was obtained, functions were better, VAS decreased. Three knees were radiologically worse, without any change in functions, VAS decreased. In 2 knees, radiological and functional results improved, VAS decreased. In 2 knees, although there was postoperative infection, VAS decreased. In only 3 knees, radiological and functional results were worse and VAS score did not change. Mean Oxford knee score was 9.7. Conclusions: Although radiological and functional results are not so good, application of the knee prosthesis decreases the patients' pain and increases the patients' satisfaction.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage137en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-9319
dc.identifier.issn1305-9327
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage132en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/22022
dc.identifier.volume5en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000420496600002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherYerkure Tanitim & Yayincilik Hizmetleri A Sen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Journal Of Bakirkoyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectKnee Prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectSuccessen_US
dc.subjectObjectiveen_US
dc.subjectSubjectiveen_US
dc.titleIs success objective or subjective in knee prosthesis?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu