Do Platform Switching Together with Subcrestal Placement have a Benefit on Marginal Bone Levels Around Dental Implants?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKuru, Leyla/0000-0002-7599-2409
dc.authoridAlmas, Khalid/0000-0002-2552-587X
dc.authorwosidAlmas, Khalid/AAE-6727-2022
dc.authorwosidElemek, Eser/HGC-9305-2022
dc.authorwosidAgrali, Omer Birkan/N-3348-2018
dc.authorwosidKuru, Leyla/AAC-9585-2019
dc.authorwosidAlmas, Khalid/A-5267-2015
dc.contributor.authorAgrali, Omer Birkan
dc.contributor.authorElemek, Eser
dc.contributor.authorDincer, Janberd
dc.contributor.authorKigili, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorCilingir, Altug
dc.contributor.authorKuru, Leyla
dc.contributor.authorAlmas, Khalid
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:54:56Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:54:56Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the marginal bone levels around platform-switched dental implants placed subcrestally in partially or totally edentulous patients who had been treated in a private practice. Methods: A total of 200 implants placed in 64 patients, with a mean follow-up time of 5.3 +/- 1.7 years, were included in the study. Implants were placed 0.5 mm subcrestally via one-or two-stage surgical approach. Data regarding the distribution and diameter of the implants, the type of the prosthetic restoration, and marginal bone levels were assessed by one calibrated examiner. Results: Overall, the mean marginal bone loss was found to be 0.82 +/- 1.6 mm, and 66% of the implants (n=81) showed no bone loss, whereas 28% (n=35) showed bone loss >1mm, and 20% (n=25) showed bone loss >2mm. Out of 18 implants in use for 1-3 years, 14 of them showed no bone loss. Among implants that were in function for 3-5 years, 25% (n=15) showed bone loss >1mm, and 12% (n=7) showed bone loss >2mm. In this study, the majority of the implants were in use for more than 5 years (n=122). Out of them, 66% (n=81) showed no bone loss, whereas 28% (n=35) showed bone loss >1 mm, and 20% (n=25) showed bone loss >2mm. Conclusion: Within the limits of this retrospective study, one can say that slight amount of marginal bone loss is observed around the platform-switched implants placed subcrestally in a long-term follow-up. However, further studies are needed to confirm this finding.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/clinexphealthsci.2017.447
dc.identifier.endpage84en_US
dc.identifier.issn2459-1459
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage80en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid374951en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/clinexphealthsci.2017.447
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/374951
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/19230
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000438242200002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAves Press Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical And Experimental Health Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBone Levelen_US
dc.subjectDental Implanten_US
dc.subjectPlatform Switchen_US
dc.subjectSubcrestal Placementen_US
dc.subjectFollow-Upen_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectSurvivalen_US
dc.subjectDiseasesen_US
dc.subjectSuccessen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectTrialen_US
dc.titleDo Platform Switching Together with Subcrestal Placement have a Benefit on Marginal Bone Levels Around Dental Implants?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu