Signal analysis of pineapple according to its anatomical region in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: Which region is most effective in suppressing gastric fluid signal?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorwosidSasani, Hadi/ABA-5166-2020
dc.contributor.authorSasani, Hadi
dc.contributor.authorKayhan, Arda
dc.contributor.authorSasani, Mehdi
dc.contributor.authorSasani, Mahmut
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:12:25Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:12:25Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractsuppress gastric fluid signal and prevent superimposition artefacts in Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) examination. The aim of this study is to in vitro investigate the effective usage of pineapple by depicting the signal characteristics of its morphological regions and its signal characteristics. Materials and methods: Five naturally harvested pineapple were examined in axial-coronal planes using TSE-T2 (Turbo spin echo) sequences in a 1.5 T MR device. The plant was divided into apical, mid-cranial, middle, mid-caudal and basal levels. In each level, 10 randomized sampling were obtained from ovary, sepal and peduncle segments using ROI. Pineapple juice was used as control group. Results: The average signal obtained from a total 50 control group was 58.55 +/- 12.47; from sepal, peduncle and ovary segments in 5 pineapple was 27.25 +/- 3.90, 194.63 +/- 62.38 and 166.2 +/- 31.3, respectively (p<0.001, p<0.005). The average signal of sepal segment was lower than control group (p<0.001). Conclusion: Concentrated pineapple juice that is routinely used in MRCP examination is a mixture of sepal, ovary and peduncle segments which may cause global increase in signal intensity and decrease homogeneity. Sepal parts of the fruit shows lowest signal suppression on MRCP sequences may have effective gastric fluid signal suppression.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage5171en_US
dc.identifier.issn0970-938X
dc.identifier.issn0976-1683
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85021692151en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage5167en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/23166
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000407324200083en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAllied Acaden_US
dc.relation.ispartofBiomedical Research-Indiaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPineappleen_US
dc.subjectCholangiopancreatographyen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imagingen_US
dc.subjectSegmental Analysisen_US
dc.subjectNegative Oral Contrasten_US
dc.subjectMr Cholangiopancreatographyen_US
dc.subjectGastrointestinal-Tracten_US
dc.subjectBlueberry Juiceen_US
dc.subjectAgenten_US
dc.subjectUrographyen_US
dc.subjectAcaien_US
dc.titleSignal analysis of pineapple according to its anatomical region in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: Which region is most effective in suppressing gastric fluid signal?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu