Comparison of the functional and radiological results of the conservatively and surgically treated displaced acetabulum fractured patients

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridErem, Murat/0000-0002-9743-5515
dc.authorwosidErem, Murat/P-6240-2018
dc.contributor.authorAlpaydin, Eren
dc.contributor.authorErem, Murat
dc.contributor.authorCopuroglu, Cem
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:50:19Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:50:19Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to compare the functional and radiological results of the conservatively and surgically treated displaced acetabular fractured patients. METHODS: The study included 61 patients with a displaced acetabulum fracture over the age of 18, who have been treated conservatively or surgically for acetabular fractures, between 2000 and 2014. Patients were divided into two groups according to their treatment type. Group 1 consisted of conservatively treated 31 between 2000 and 2010 patients and Group 2 consisted of surgically treated 30 patients between 2010 and 2014. The fractures were classified according to Judet and Letournel classification. Clinical evaluation of the patients was conducted according to Modified Merle D'Aubigne Score, SF-36, and Harris Hip Score. Radiological evaluation was evaluated according to Matta's Radiological Evaluation Criteria. Kolmogorov-Smirnov, t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and two Wilcoxon paired sample tests were used for statistical analysis. The significance limit was chosen as p<0.05. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 10 years for the conservative group and 5.5 years for the surgery group. There was no statistically significant difference in functional scores between both groups (p>0.05), Matta's radiological staging score was significantly higher in the operated group (p=0.023). CONCLUSION: Radiological scores are not directly correlated with the functional capacity. We obtained good radiological and functional scores in the surgical group, operative treatment should be considered when absolute indications are there. The outcome of conservatively managed fractures is not bleak. We think that there is an alternative to surgical treatment in displaced acetabular fractures and that similar functional results can be obtained in selected cases.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/tjtes.2021.00310
dc.identifier.endpage1179en_US
dc.identifier.issn1306-696X
dc.identifier.issn1307-7945
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35920413en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85135311932en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1170en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1137401en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.00310
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1137401
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/17964
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000858853800013en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Assoc Trauma Emergency Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUlusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal Of Trauma & Emergency Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAcetabulum Fractureen_US
dc.subjectConservative Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectSurgical Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectOperative Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectOpen Reductionen_US
dc.titleComparison of the functional and radiological results of the conservatively and surgically treated displaced acetabulum fractured patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu