Surgical Treatment of Patients with Tracheal Rupture Following Endotracheal Intubation

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorwosidsagiroglu, gönül/AAB-4472-2021
dc.authorwosidSagiroglu, Gonul/ABH-1345-2021
dc.authorwosidTezel, Cagatay/W-5790-2019
dc.contributor.authorSagiroglu, Gonul
dc.contributor.authorSagiroglu, Tamer
dc.contributor.authorMeydan, Burhan
dc.contributor.authorTezel, Cagatay
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:03:59Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:03:59Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: We aimed to present clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients who had tracheal rupture following intubation due to surgical interventions. Material and Methods: Five patients (M/F, 1/4; Mean age, 53.8 +/- 10.9 years) who were diagnosed as having tracheal rupture during or soon after surgery were included in the study and evaluated retrospectively. History, clinical features, patient characteristics, and localizations of rupture, diagnostic modalities, and treatment outcomes were reported. Results: Two of the patients were intubated with a single-lumen tube, whereas 3 patients were intubated by using a double-lumen tube. The most common symptom that led to diagnosis was subcutaneous emphysema. One patient was diagnosed during stump control before the occurrence of symptoms. It is considered that using a stylet during intubation might be a risk factor, as four of our patients were intubated with the help of a stylet. Only one patient had a difficult intubation. Conclusion: Close postoperative monitorization of patients intubated due to surgical interventions, may enable us to determine tracheal ruptute cases in the early period before symptoms occur. The most common symptom was subcutaneous emphysema in the present case series. Thus, it is considered as the most effective warning symptom. In the light of the above findings, it is suggested that difficult intubation may not add to the risk of tracheal rupture.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5174/tutfd.2010.03725.3
dc.identifier.endpage255en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-3123
dc.identifier.issn2146-3131
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-80053356178en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage252en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5174/tutfd.2010.03725.3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/21868
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000295492900005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherGalenos Publ Houseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBalkan Medical Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectIntubationen_US
dc.subjectTracheal Ruptureen_US
dc.subjectStyleten_US
dc.subjectSubcutaneous Emphysemaen_US
dc.subjectDifficult Intubationen_US
dc.subjectDouble-Lumen Tubeen_US
dc.subjectLacerationen_US
dc.subjectTracheostomyen_US
dc.subjectComplicationen_US
dc.subjectPerforationen_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.titleSurgical Treatment of Patients with Tracheal Rupture Following Endotracheal Intubationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu