Do the Sealer Solvents Used Affect Apically Extruded Debris in Retreatment?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridEr, Özgür/0000-0002-4999-5104
dc.authoridDincer, Asiye Nur/0000-0002-6713-1940
dc.authorwosidEr, Özgür/A-4734-2018
dc.authorwosidÇanakçı, Burhan Can/AGV-8520-2022
dc.contributor.authorCanakci, Burhan Can
dc.contributor.authorEr, Ozgur
dc.contributor.authorDincer, Asiye
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:52:18Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:52:18Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: We evaluated apically extruded debris in the retreatment of root canals filled with different root canal sealers and gutta-percha using different solvents. Methods: Ninety human mandibular central and lateral teeth were prepared using the Reciproc #25.08 nickel-titanium system (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) and were divided randomly into 6 groups. In groups 1, 2, and 3, root canals were filled with epoxy resin based sealer and gutta-percha, and in groups 4, 5, and 6, root canals were filled with zinc oxide eugenol based sealer and gutta-percha. Each tooth was placed in a glass vial experimental apparatus. All root canal fillings were removed with the ProTaper Retreatment nickel-titanium system (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). During the retreatment procedure, in group 1, Resosolv (Pierre Rolland, Merignac, France) was used; in group 4, Endosolv E (Septodont, Paris, France) was used; and in groups 2 and 5, Guttasolv (Septodont) was used as the solvent. In the control groups (groups 3 and 6), no solvent was used. Reciproc #40 .06 was used for the final preparation. The times required for retreatments were recorded. Results: The weight of the extruded debris and the time required for retreatment were decreased significantly in the groups in which a solvent that was intended specifically for the root canal sealer was used (groups 1 and 4). In the Guttasolv groups (groups 2 and 5), the amount of apically extruded debris and the time required decreased for both root canal sealers. Conclusions: The amount of apically extruded debris and the duration of retreatment were reduced by the use of a solvent specific to the sealer compared with a gutta-percha solvent or no solvent.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipErciyes University Scientific Research Projects Unit; TDK [2013-4230]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by Erciyes University Scientific Research Projects Unit with TDK (project number 2013-4230).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.010
dc.identifier.endpage1509en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26238529en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84940720258en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1507en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.010
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/18667
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000361082300021en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectApical Extrusionen_US
dc.subjectRetreatmenten_US
dc.subjectSolventen_US
dc.subjectGutta-Percha Removalen_US
dc.subjectProtaper Universal Rotaryen_US
dc.subjectRoot-Canal Retreatmenten_US
dc.subjectEndodontic Retreatmenten_US
dc.subjectFlare-Upsen_US
dc.subjectEfficacyen_US
dc.subjectSystemen_US
dc.subjectInstrumentationen_US
dc.titleDo the Sealer Solvents Used Affect Apically Extruded Debris in Retreatment?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu