Basketbol sporcularının antrenörlerinin sportmenlik davranışları hakkındaki görüşlerinin incelenmesi
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2023
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Trakya Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Bu araştırmanın amacı, basketbol sporcularının antrenörlerinin sportmen davranışları hakkındaki görüşlerinin alınması ve değerlendirilmesidir. Bilinmektedir ki antrenörler sporcuları için negatif/pozitif yönleriyle rol model kimlikleriyle de örnek alınabilmektedirler. Çalışma da -gönüllü katılımla- araştırma kapsamına alınan sporcuların antrenörlerinin hangi durumlarda sportmen davranış gösterip, göstermediğini ortaya konması hedeflendi. Araştırmaya, 100 basketbol sporcusu katılmış olup, “Antrenör Sportmen Davranış Ölçeği”, Google Drive üzerinden online ankete dönüştürülerek katılımcılara internet üzerinden uygulandı. Araştırmaya 12-15 yaş arasında 1 sporcu, 16-20 yaş arasında 13 sporcu, 21-25 yaş arasında 62 sporcu, 26-30 yaş arasında 10 sporcu ve 30 yaş ve üstünde 14 sporcu katıldı. Çalışmaya katılanlardan elde edilen veriler SPSS 25 programına uygun bir şekle getirilmiş ve kodlanarak buraya aktarıldı. Örneklem sayısı 100 olduğu için (n?30) Kolmogorov Smirnov testinin p değeri kontrol edildi. Tüm ölçek ve alt boyutlarda p değeri 0.05’den küçük olduğu için normal dağılmadığına karar verildi. Uygulanan çalışmanın veri analizi boyunca %95 güvenilirlik aralığı temel alındı. Nicel veriler karşılaştırılırken parametrik olmayan 3 veya daha fazla grup arasındaki farkı analiz etmek için Kruskal Wallis-H testi uygulandı. Araştırmanın değişkenleri arasındaki ilişki Spearman Korelasyon Analizi ile test edildi. Kullanılan ölçek olan Antrenörlerin Sportmen Davranış Ölçeğinin (?=0.924) güvenirliği yüksek derecede güvenilir olduğu kabul edildi. Biyolojik Yaş, Basketbol Yaşı ileAntrenörlerin Sportmen Davranış Ölçeği sonuçları incelendiğinde, anlamlı düzeyde bir farklılığın olmadığı saptanmıştır (p>0.05). Antrenörlerin Sportmen Davranış Ölçeğinden puanları basketbol yaşı grubu değişkenine göre anlamlı bir farklılık göstermektedir (X 2 =7.97, Sd.=3, p<0.05). Sportmenliğe Yönelik Beklenti Oluşturulması alt ölçeğinden alınan puanları basketbol yaşı grubu değişkenine göre anlamlı bir farklılık göstermektedir (X 2 =17.88, Sd.=3, p<0.05). Sportmenlik Dışı Davranışın Cezalandırılması, Sportmenliğin Öğretilmesi, Sportmenliğin Desteklenmesi, Kazanmanın Sportmenlikten Öncelikli Olması, Sportmenliğe Yönelik Model Oluşturulması alt ölçeği basketbol yaşı grubuna göre anlamlı düzeyde farklılık göstermemektedir (p>0.05). Antrenörlerin Sportmen Davranış Ölçeğinden puanları yaş grubu değişkenine göre anlamlı bir farklılık göstermektedir (X 2 =13.97, Sd.=4, p<0.05). Sportmenliğin Öğretilmesi alt ölçeğinden puanları yaş grubu değişkenine göre anlamlı bir farklılık göstermektedir (X 2 =17.88, Sd.=4, p<0.05). Sportmenliğe Yönelik Beklenti Oluşturulması, Sportmenlik Dışı Davranışın Cezalandırılması, Sportmenliğin Desteklenmesi, Kazanmanın Sportmenlikten Öncelikli Olması, Sportmenliğe Yönelik Model Oluşturulması alt ölçeği yaş grubuna göre anlamlı düzeyde farklılık göstermemektedir (p>0.05).
The aim of thisresearch is to obtain and evaluate the opinions of the coaches of basketball players about their sportsman behaviors. It is known that coaches can also be taken role models for their players with their negative/positive aspects. In the study, it was targeted to reveal in which situations the coaches of the players who were included in there search with voluntary participation whether they showed sportsman behavior or not. 100 basketball athletes participated in there search and the "CoachSportsmanBehaviorScale" was turned into an online survey via Google Drive and applied to the participants over the internet. 1 player between the ages of 12-15, 13 players between the ages of 16-20, 62 players between the ages of 21-25, 10 players between the ages of 26-30 and 14 players aged 30 and older participated in there search. The data obtained from the study participants were suited to a form in accordance with the SPSS 20 program and transferred here by coding. Since the sample size was 100 (n?30), the p value of the Kolmogorov Smirnov test was checked. It was decided that it was normally distributed because the p value was less than 0.05 in all scales and sub-dimensions. Through the data analysis of theappliedstudy a 95% confidence interval was taken as a basis.When comparing quantitative data, Kruskal Wallis-H test was applied to analyze the difference between 3 or more non-parametric groups. The connection between the variables of the study was tested by using Spearman Correlation Analysis. Thescale, which was used as the Sportsmanlike Behavior Scale of Coaches (?=0.924), was considered quitereliable. According to the comparison of biological age with Basketball Age, when the results of the Coaches Sportsman Behavior Scale were examined, it was found that there was no significant difference (p>0.05). The scores of the coaches from the Sportsman Behavior Scales howed a significant difference in accordance with the basketball age group variable (X2=7.97, Sd.=3, p<0.05). The scores obtained from the leading to Sportsman Expectation Subscales how a significant difference according to the basketball age group variable (X2=17.88, Sd.=3, p<0.05). The scores obtained from the creating an Expectation for Sportsman Subscales how a significant difference according to the basketball age group variable (X2=17.88, Sd.=3, p<0.05). The subscale of Punishment of Unsportsman Behavior, Teaching Sportsman, Supporting Sportsman, Priority of Winning as well as Sportsman, Creating a Model for Sportsman does not differ significantly according to the basketball age group (p>0.05). The scores of the coaches from the Sportsman Behavior Scales how a significant difference in regard to the age group variable (X2=13.97, Sd.=4, p<0.05). The scores from the Teaching of Sportsman subscales how a significant difference according to the age group variable (X2=17.88, Sd.=4, p<0.05). The subscale of Creating an Expectation for Sportsman, Punishment of Unsportsman Behavior, Supporting Sportsman, Priority of Winning as well as Sportsman, Creating a Model for Sportsman does not differ significantly according to age group (p>0.05).
The aim of thisresearch is to obtain and evaluate the opinions of the coaches of basketball players about their sportsman behaviors. It is known that coaches can also be taken role models for their players with their negative/positive aspects. In the study, it was targeted to reveal in which situations the coaches of the players who were included in there search with voluntary participation whether they showed sportsman behavior or not. 100 basketball athletes participated in there search and the "CoachSportsmanBehaviorScale" was turned into an online survey via Google Drive and applied to the participants over the internet. 1 player between the ages of 12-15, 13 players between the ages of 16-20, 62 players between the ages of 21-25, 10 players between the ages of 26-30 and 14 players aged 30 and older participated in there search. The data obtained from the study participants were suited to a form in accordance with the SPSS 20 program and transferred here by coding. Since the sample size was 100 (n?30), the p value of the Kolmogorov Smirnov test was checked. It was decided that it was normally distributed because the p value was less than 0.05 in all scales and sub-dimensions. Through the data analysis of theappliedstudy a 95% confidence interval was taken as a basis.When comparing quantitative data, Kruskal Wallis-H test was applied to analyze the difference between 3 or more non-parametric groups. The connection between the variables of the study was tested by using Spearman Correlation Analysis. Thescale, which was used as the Sportsmanlike Behavior Scale of Coaches (?=0.924), was considered quitereliable. According to the comparison of biological age with Basketball Age, when the results of the Coaches Sportsman Behavior Scale were examined, it was found that there was no significant difference (p>0.05). The scores of the coaches from the Sportsman Behavior Scales howed a significant difference in accordance with the basketball age group variable (X2=7.97, Sd.=3, p<0.05). The scores obtained from the leading to Sportsman Expectation Subscales how a significant difference according to the basketball age group variable (X2=17.88, Sd.=3, p<0.05). The scores obtained from the creating an Expectation for Sportsman Subscales how a significant difference according to the basketball age group variable (X2=17.88, Sd.=3, p<0.05). The subscale of Punishment of Unsportsman Behavior, Teaching Sportsman, Supporting Sportsman, Priority of Winning as well as Sportsman, Creating a Model for Sportsman does not differ significantly according to the basketball age group (p>0.05). The scores of the coaches from the Sportsman Behavior Scales how a significant difference in regard to the age group variable (X2=13.97, Sd.=4, p<0.05). The scores from the Teaching of Sportsman subscales how a significant difference according to the age group variable (X2=17.88, Sd.=4, p<0.05). The subscale of Creating an Expectation for Sportsman, Punishment of Unsportsman Behavior, Supporting Sportsman, Priority of Winning as well as Sportsman, Creating a Model for Sportsman does not differ significantly according to age group (p>0.05).
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Basketbol, Sportmenlik, Antrenör, Yaş, Basketbol yaşı, Basketball, Sportman, Coach, Age, Basketballage
