A Retrospective Trial Comparing the Effects of Different Anesthetic Techniques on Phantom Pain After Lower Limb Amputation

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridŞenol, Mehmet Güney/0000-0001-6397-9293
dc.authoridColak, Alkin/0000-0001-9103-4844
dc.authorwosidŞenol, Mehmet Güney/L-9182-2015
dc.authorwosidYILMAZ, BARIS/A-1070-2018
dc.authorwosidColak, Alkin/R-8739-2017
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Sevtap Hekimoglu
dc.contributor.authorColak, Alkin
dc.contributor.authorArar, Cavidan
dc.contributor.authorTutunculer, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorSut, Necdet
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Baris
dc.contributor.authorBirtane, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:51:29Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:51:29Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Pain and other sensations from an amputated or absent limb, called phantom pain and phantom sensations, are well-known phenomena. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effects of anesthetic techniques on phantom pain, phantom sensations, and stump pain after lower limb amputation. METHODS: Ninety-two patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to III were analyzed for 1 to 24 months after lower limb amputation in this retrospective study. Patients received general, spinal, or epidural anesthesia or peripheral nerve block for their amputations. Standardized questions were used to assess phantom limb pain, phantom sensation, and stump pain postoperatively. Pain intensity was assessed on a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10. Patients' medical histories were determined from hospital records. RESULTS: Patients who received epidural anesthesia and peripheral nerve block perceived significantly less pain in the week after surgery compared with patients who received general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia (NRS [SD] values, 2.68 [1.0] and 2.70 [1.0] respectively). After approximately 14 to 17 months, there was no difference in phantom limb pain, phantom sensation, or stump pain among the anesthetic techniques for amputation. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing lower limb amputation, performing epidural anesthesia or peripheral nerve block, instead of general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia, might attenuate phantom and stump pain in the first week after operation. Anesthetic technique might not have an effect on phantom limb pain, phantom sensation, or stump pain at 14 to 17 months after lower limb amputation. (Curr Tiler Res Clin Exp. 2011;72:127-137) (C) 2011 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.curtheres.2011.06.001
dc.identifier.endpage137en_US
dc.identifier.issn0011-393X
dc.identifier.issn1879-0313
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24648582en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79959913372en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage127en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.curtheres.2011.06.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/18384
dc.identifier.volume72en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000292858200004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Therapeutic Research-Clinical And Experimentalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAmputation Stumpsen_US
dc.subjectAnesthesia And Analgesiaen_US
dc.subjectLimben_US
dc.subjectPhantomen_US
dc.subjectRegional Analgesiaen_US
dc.subjectStump Painen_US
dc.subjectPreventionen_US
dc.subjectSensationsen_US
dc.subjectAmputeesen_US
dc.titleA Retrospective Trial Comparing the Effects of Different Anesthetic Techniques on Phantom Pain After Lower Limb Amputationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu