Accuracy of 14 intraoral scanners for the All-on-4 treatment concept: a comparative in vitro study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridBilmenoglu, Caglar/0000-0002-2580-9899
dc.authorwosidBilmenoglu, Caglar/HGE-5706-2022
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Gozde
dc.contributor.authorBilmenoglu, Caglar
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:03:59Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:03:59Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of 14 different intraoral scanners for the All-on-4 treatment concept. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four implants were placed in regions 13, 16, 23, and 26 of an edentulous maxillary model that was poured with scannable Type 4 gypsum to imitate the All-on-4 concept. The cast was scanned 10 times for each of 14 intraoral scanners (Primescan, iTero 2, iTero 5D, Virtuo Vivo, Trios 3, Trios 4, CS3600, CS3700, Emerald, Emerald S, Medit i500, BenQ BIS-I, Heron IOS, and Aadva IOS 100P) after the polyether ether ketone scanbody was placed. For the control group, the gypsum model was scanned 10 times with an industrial scanner. The first of the 10 virtual models obtained from the industrial model was chosen as the reference model. For trueness, the data of the 14 dental scanners were superimposed with the reference model; for precision, the data of all 14 scanners were superimposed within the groups. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Shapiro-Wilks, and Dunn's tests.RESULTS. Primescan showed the highest trueness and precision values (P < .005), followed by the iTero 5D scanner (P < .005). CONCLUSION. Some of these digital scanners can be used to make impressions within the All-on-4 concept. However, the possibility of data loss due to artifacts, reflections, and the inability to combine the data should be considered. [J Adv Prosthodont 2022;14:388-98]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch Fund of Trakya University [2020/126]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work was supported by the Research Fund of Trakya University. Project No. 2020/126.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4047/jap.2022.14.6.388
dc.identifier.endpage398en_US
dc.identifier.issn2005-7806
dc.identifier.issn2005-7814
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36685788en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85145843348en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage388en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.6.388
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/21865
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000960868400006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKorean Acad Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Advanced Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectIntraoral Scanneren_US
dc.subjectTruenessen_US
dc.subjectPrecisionen_US
dc.subjectAccuracyen_US
dc.subjectDigital Impressionen_US
dc.subjectImpressionen_US
dc.subjectTruenessen_US
dc.subjectImpacten_US
dc.titleAccuracy of 14 intraoral scanners for the All-on-4 treatment concept: a comparative in vitro studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu