VATS cost is less than thoracotomy in operable NSCLC patients br

dc.authorwosidKaynak, Kamil/AAC-9532-2019
dc.contributor.authorTurna, Akif
dc.contributor.authorSarbay, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorSozen, Mehmet Berat
dc.contributor.authorAlturk, Leyla
dc.contributor.authorOzcibik, Gizem
dc.contributor.authorKaynak, Kamil
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:58:39Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:58:39Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND AIM: Better management of financial resources provided by the govern-ment-based insurance system is one of the important challenges in the administration of hospi-tals. The aim of this study was to compare videothoracoscopic surgery and open thoracotomy regarding cost and hospital stay. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or open thoracotomy for operable (stage IA-IIIA) non-small cell lung cancer were analyzed retro-spectively. The general cost of hospital treatment, cost of operation, and cost of hospital stay of these patients were compared. RESULTS: A total of 48 lobectomies, 33 wedge resections, 2 segmentectomies, and 5 pneu-monectomies were analyzed. Fifty-eight patients (65.9%) underwent VATS resection, and 30 patients (34.1%) had resection via open thoracotomy. There was no statistically significant dif-ference in terms of gender, age, and pulmonary function test between the groups. The postop-erative hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, was higher in patients who underwent thoracotomy compared with patients who underwent VATS (p=0.006 vs p=0.02). The total hospital cost and the cost of operation for patients operated via VATS were lower compared with the costs for patients operated via thoracotomy (p=0.026 vs p=0.014). When analyzed separately, the cost of VATS lobectomy was lower than that of lobectomy via thoracotomy; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.114). CONCLUSIONS: The total hospital cost and the cost of operation via VATS are lower than the costs of thoracotomy. VATS also leads to a reduced hospital stay. VATS should be considered the gold standard in resectional surgery in patients who need lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/ejop_36_21
dc.identifier.endpage34en_US
dc.identifier.issn2148-3620
dc.identifier.issn2148-5402
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage29en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid522267en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/ejop_36_21
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/522267
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/20150
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000834605100005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKare Publen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEurasian Journal Of Pulmonologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCosten_US
dc.subjectLung Canceren_US
dc.subjectThoracotomyen_US
dc.subjectVideo-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectLung-Canceren_US
dc.subjectThoracoscopic Lobectomyen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.titleVATS cost is less than thoracotomy in operable NSCLC patients bren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar