Reduction of pain during intravenous cannulation in children: Buzzy application

dc.authorwosidAkgün Kostak, Melahat/AAA-6668-2022
dc.contributor.authorSemerci, Remziye
dc.contributor.authorKocaaslan, Esra Nur
dc.contributor.authorKostak, Melahat Akgun
dc.contributor.authorAkin, Nefise
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:12:01Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:12:01Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study was a randomized, controlled examination of the effect of the Buzzy device (MMJ Labs, LLC, Atlanta, GA, USA) in reducing pain during peripheral intravenous cannulation in children. The device uses a combination of high-frequency vibration and cold to block pain. Methods:The study was conducted with 56 children aged 7-12 years who presented at the pediatric emergency department of Trakya University Health Center for Medical Research and Practice. Data were gathered using a family and child data collection form and the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (Wong-Baker FACES Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA). A vein visualization tool was used in both groups for peripheral intravenous cannulation, and the Buzzy device was also used in the experimental group. The pain of the children was assessed by a nurse and the children. Descriptive statistics, the Wilcoxon t-test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and correlation analysis were used to evaluate the data. The results were evaluated at a 95% confidence interval and p<0.05 was accepted as the level of significance. Results: The mean age of the children was 8.37 +/- 1.96 years and 58.9% were male. The mean pain score provided by the children in the experimental group was 3.40 +/- 3.56 and it was 3.76 +/- 3.06 in the control group. The mean pain score reported by the nurse for the experimental group was 4.53 +/- 3.44 and 3.76 +/- 2.73 for the control group. There was no significant difference between the pain scores reported by the children and the nurse according to group (p<0.05). However, there was a significant difference between the pain scores recorded by the nurse and the children (p=0.034). Conclusion: The Buzzy device was not effective in reducing pain during intravenous cannulation. The level of pain reported by the nurse was higher than that described by the children. It is recommended that training on pain assessment and the use of distraction methods should be provided to nurses working in pediatric emergency departments.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/agri.2020.02223
dc.identifier.endpage185en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0012
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33398861en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85098566801en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage177en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid424700en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2020.02223
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/424700
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/22993
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000590886500001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherKare Publen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAgri-The Journal Of The Turkish Society Of Algologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPain Managementen_US
dc.subjectBuzzyen_US
dc.subjectPeripheral Intravenous Cannulationen_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.subjectPediatric Emergency-Departmenten_US
dc.subjectProcedural Painen_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectNursesen_US
dc.subjectReliefen_US
dc.subjectVenipunctureen_US
dc.subjectVibrationen_US
dc.subjectAnxietyen_US
dc.subjectColden_US
dc.titleReduction of pain during intravenous cannulation in children: Buzzy applicationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar