Comparison of long-term results of trabeculectomy to treat pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and primary open angle glaucoma

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridGüçlü, Hande/0000-0002-3021-0493
dc.authorwosidOzal, Sadık Altan/B-5123-2019
dc.authorwosidGüçlü, Hande/AAW-9756-2020
dc.contributor.authorGurlu, Vuslat Pelitli
dc.contributor.authorGuclu, Hande
dc.contributor.authorOzal, Altan
dc.contributor.authorBenian, Omer
dc.contributor.authorAlimgil, Levent
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:12:52Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:12:52Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAIM: To compare the long term outcome of trabeculectomy in patients with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEG) and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) in terms of surgical success. METHODS: The success of the trabeculectomy was evaluated by three criteria. Criterion A: intraocular pressure (IOP) <= 21 mm Hg and decrease in IOP >= 20%; Criterion B: IOP <= 18 mm Hg and decrease in IOP >= 30%; Criterion C: IOP <= 15 mm Hg and decrease in IOP >= 50%. Patients that met these criteria without medical treatment were considered to be completely successful, while those that met these criteria with medical treatment were considered partially successful. Significance levels of differences between the POAG and PEG groups in the Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated with the log-rank test. RESULTS: Sixty-four eyes from 64 patients with PEG and 51 eyes from 51 patients with POAG were evaluated. No significant differences were detected between the PEG and POAG groups according to full or partial success relative to each of the three criteria (A: P=0.73, 0.32; B: P=0.73, 0.31; C: P=0.90, 0.27). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in the long-term success of trabeculectomy between PEG and POAG patients whose clinical characteristics are otherwise the same.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.18240/ijo.2018.01.12
dc.identifier.endpage70en_US
dc.identifier.issn2222-3959
dc.identifier.issn2227-4898
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid29375993en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85040965326en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage66en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2018.01.12
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/23342
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000424801800012en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIjo Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal Of Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPrimary Open Angle Glaucomaen_US
dc.subjectPseudoexfoliative Glaucomaen_US
dc.subjectTrabeculectomy Successen_US
dc.subjectOptical Coherence Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectFollow-Upen_US
dc.subjectExfoliation Syndromeen_US
dc.subjectRisk-Factorsen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectEyesen_US
dc.titleComparison of long-term results of trabeculectomy to treat pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and primary open angle glaucomaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu