Does quantitative tibial ultrasound predict low bone mineral density defined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry?

dc.authoridCermik, Tevfik Fikret/0000-0001-7622-7277
dc.authoridTuna, Filiz/0000-0002-9563-8028
dc.authoridtuna, hakan/0000-0002-5980-8413
dc.authorwosidCermik, Tevfik Fikret/A-9694-2018
dc.authorwosidtuna, filiz/ABD-4110-2020
dc.contributor.authorTuna, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorBirtane, Murat
dc.contributor.authorEkuklu, Galip
dc.contributor.authorCermik, Fikret
dc.contributor.authorTuna, Filiz
dc.contributor.authorKokino, Siranus
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:13:12Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:13:12Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Efforts for the early detection of bone loss and subsequent fracture risk by quantitative ultrasound (QUS), which is a non-invasive, radiation free, and cheaper method, seem rational to reduce the management costs. We aimed in this study to assess the probable correlation of speed of sound (SOS) values obtained by QUS with bone mineral density (BMD) as measured by the gold standard method, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and to investigate the diagnostic value of QUS to define low BMD. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty-two postmenopausal women having prior standard DEXA measurements were included in the study. Spine and proximal femur (neck, trochanter and Ward's triangle) BMD were assessed in a standard protocol by DEXA. The middle point of the right tibia was chosen for SOS measurement by tibial QUS. Results: The SOS values were observed to be significantly higher in the normal BMD (t score > - 1) group at all measurement sites except for the lumbar region, when compared with the low BMD group (t score < - 1). SOS was negatively correlated with age (r = - 0.66) and month since menopause (r = - 0.57). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for QUS t score to diagnose low BMD did not seem to be satisfactory at either of the measurement sites. Conclusion: Tibial SOS was correlated weakly with BMD values of femur and lumbar spine as measured by DEXA and its diagnostic value did not seem to be high for discriminating between normal and low BMD, at these sites.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3349/ymj.2008.49.3.436
dc.identifier.endpage442en_US
dc.identifier.issn0513-5796
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18581594en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-48649101368en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage436en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2008.49.3.436
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/23468
dc.identifier.volume49en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000257277000014en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherYonsei Univ College Medicineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofYonsei Medical Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectQuantitative Tibial Ultrasounden_US
dc.subjectLow Bone Mineral Densityen_US
dc.subjectOsteoporotic Fracturesen_US
dc.subjectCalcaneusen_US
dc.subjectWomenen_US
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
dc.subjectDxaen_US
dc.subjectAgeen_US
dc.titleDoes quantitative tibial ultrasound predict low bone mineral density defined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar