The Evaluation of The Agreements of Different Epilepsy Classifications in Seizures Recorded With Video EEG Monitoring

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridGULDIKEN, Baburhan/0000-0002-9006-1880
dc.authoridBaykan, Betul/0000-0002-3360-659X
dc.authorwosidbebek, nerses/W-7266-2019
dc.authorwosidBaykan, Betul/J-5307-2014
dc.contributor.authorGuldiken, Baburhan
dc.contributor.authorBaykan, Betul
dc.contributor.authorSut, Necdet
dc.contributor.authorBebek, Nerses
dc.contributor.authorGurses, Candan
dc.contributor.authorGokyigit, Aysen
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:00:30Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:00:30Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The main purpose of the epilepsy classifications is to guide physicians to get the correct diagnosis and subsequently select the appropriate treatment. When using the daily classifications, the diagnosis and treatment of some patients sometimes remain unsatisfying, and video EEG monitoring (VEM) is the alternatively applied diagnostic tool in such patients. In the present study, the agreement of different classifications before and after short term VEM is investigated. Methods: Three hundred ninety-one patients who had undergone VEM were enrolled in the study. Forty-five cases, whose epileptic seizures could be recorded, were classified before and International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Commission on Terminology and Classification, and Semiological Seizure Classification reported by Luders et al. in 1998. Results: The intra-observer agreements of Semiological Seizure, 1989 and 2010 Electroclinical Syndrome Classifications were found to be substantial, whereas those of 1981 and 2010 Epileptic Seizure Classifications were moderate. The initial clinical diagnosis was changed in 44.7% to 56.5% of patients where a change of treatment was needed in 36.5% of the cases. Conclusion: While the Semiological Seizure Classification appears to be more consistent than the 1981 and 2010 Seizure Classifications, the impact of short term VEM on the accurate classification is remarkable.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage211en_US
dc.identifier.issn1302-1664
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84862278454en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage201en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/20865
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000305266500003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherJournal Neurological Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Neurological Sciences-Turkishen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEpilepsyen_US
dc.subjectEpilepsy Classificationen_US
dc.subjectVideo EEG Monitoringen_US
dc.subjectTerminologyen_US
dc.subjectChildrenen_US
dc.subjectUtilityen_US
dc.titleThe Evaluation of The Agreements of Different Epilepsy Classifications in Seizures Recorded With Video EEG Monitoringen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu