Retro-Orbital Intraconal Fat Injection: An Experimental Study in Rabbits

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridYALCIN, OMER TARIK/0000-0001-5626-1881
dc.authorwosidYALCIN, OMER TARIK/B-4744-2018
dc.contributor.authorCakir, Beyhan
dc.contributor.authorAygit, Ahmet Cemal
dc.contributor.authorOmur-Okten, Ozerk
dc.contributor.authorYalcin, Omer
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T11:19:58Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T11:19:58Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Despite adequate treatment, enophthalmos due to intraconjunctival corticosteroid injection and enlargement of the bony orbit after trauma remains a frequent complication. The use of alloplastic material in addressing this problem is restricted because it may result in allergic reactions and is not cost-effective. The use of retro-orbital intraconal injection is the most effective method for maximum augmentation. An inexpensive and minimally invasive alternative that also allows for reoperation when needed would be a preferred intervention. Materials and Methods: We used 24 white rabbits (New Zealand) in our study. The animals were divided into 2 groups: a fat group and a saline solution group. The first group was subjected to retrobulbar fat injection, and the second group underwent physiologic saline solution injection. The volume of the retrobulbar area was measured and statistically evaluated both before and after the injections. Sonographically measured retrobulbar volumes were then statistically analyzed. Results: When the saline solution and fat groups were compared, no significant difference was observed between the preinjection volumes of the orbits. However, after injection, there was a significant difference between volumes. A statistically significant difference was shown between retroorbital volumes calculated before the injection in the fat group and volumes calculated immediately after injection and in the following 4 months (right retro-orbital volume of 1.291 cm(3) +/- 0.031 cm(3) before injection and 2.656 cm(3) +/- 0.040 cm(3) in the fourth month, P < .05). Conclusions: Volume augmentation by fat injection is superior to complicated surgical methods because of the advantages of decreased morbidity, rapid rehabilitation, and ease of reinjection. Using fat tissue as a filling material is more reliable, easier, and cheaper in comparison to other implantable materials. (C) 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:242-250,2012en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.091
dc.identifier.endpage250en_US
dc.identifier.issn0278-2391
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21763046en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84355162252en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage242en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.091
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/25400
dc.identifier.volume70en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000299214500055en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co-Elsevier Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSoft-Tissue Augmentationen_US
dc.subjectPosttraumatic Enophthalmosen_US
dc.subjectVolume Augmentationen_US
dc.subjectAutologous Faten_US
dc.subjectCorticosteroid Injectionen_US
dc.subjectAnophthalmic Orbiten_US
dc.subjectAdipose-Tissueen_US
dc.subjectTransplantationen_US
dc.subjectAtrophyen_US
dc.titleRetro-Orbital Intraconal Fat Injection: An Experimental Study in Rabbitsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu