Comparison of TruView EVO2 laryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope on patients undergoing caesarean section

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid24461742700
dc.authorscopusid7003369853
dc.authorscopusid16305985600
dc.authorscopusid57192707651
dc.contributor.authorİnal M.T.
dc.contributor.authorMemiş D.
dc.contributor.authorYandım T.
dc.contributor.authorErsöz Ş.
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:29:01Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:29:01Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractObjective: A significant part of developing complications from anaesthesia during caesarean section is related to airway management. The goal of this study was to determine the efficiency of the TruView EVO2 laryngoscope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope on patients undergoing caesarean section. Material and Method: One hundred patients requiring endotracheal intubation for caesarean delivery were divided into two groups: Group T, using the TruView EVO2 laryngoscope (n=50), and Group M, using the Macintosh laryngoscope (n=50). The view of the glottis evaluating Cormack-Lehane classification, the intubation time, the success rate, the number of intubation attempts, the blood on blade, minor laceration, dental/airway trauma, and the lowest peripheral oxygen saturation during intubation attempts were noted. Results: The view with the TruView EVO2 laryngoscope was better than the view with the Macintosh laryngoscope, using the Cormack-Lehane classification (p<0.05) for evaluation. The intubation time was 6.0±1.9 sec in group M and 13.8±3.3 sec in group T (p<0.001). The success rate was 100% in all groups. The number of intubation attempts was 46/2/2 in group T and 45/3/2 in group M (p>0.05). Blood on blade was detected in five patients in group T and in four patients in group M. Minor laceration was detected in four patients in group T and in three patients in group M. No statistically difference was detected in the incidence of complications. The lowest peripheral oxygen saturation during intubation attempts was 99.14±0.67 in group T and 99.00±0.72 in group M (p>0.05). Conclusion: The TruView EVO2 laryngoscope provides better laryngeal views and similar peripheral oxygen saturations and complication rates when compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope; thus, it can be used for intubation in obstetric patients. © 2016, Nobelmedicus. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage16en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-2381
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85007587036en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage12en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/17548
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNobelmedicusen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNobel Medicusen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMacintosh Laryngoscope, Obstetric Airway; Truview Evo2 Laryngoscopeen_US
dc.subjectAdult; Arterial Oxygen Saturation; Article; Blood Pressure Monitoring; Cesarean Section; Comparative Study; Controlled Study; Disease Classification; Electrocardiography; Endotracheal Intubation; Female; Human; Laceration; Laryngoscope; Laryngoscopy; Major Clinical Study; Male; Medical Device Contamination; Operation Duration; Pulse Oximetry; Scoring Systemen_US
dc.titleComparison of TruView EVO2 laryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope on patients undergoing caesarean sectionen_US
dc.title.alternativeSezeryan operasyonu geçirecek hastalarda TruView EVO2 laringoskopu ve Macintosh laringoskopunun karşilaştirilmasien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu