Investigation of the effectiveness of prone ventilation in patients followed up for acute respiratory distress syndrome in the intensive care unit

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridYILDIRIM, İLKER/0000-0002-4245-1163
dc.authoridAydın, Cihan/0000-0002-1401-5727
dc.authoridGultekin, Ahmet/0000-0003-4570-8339
dc.authorwosidYILDIRIM, İLKER/JVN-4780-2024
dc.authorwosidAydın, Cihan/AED-1751-2022
dc.authorwosidGultekin, Ahmet/ABA-7274-2020
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, I.
dc.contributor.authorAydin, C.
dc.contributor.authorGultekin, A.
dc.contributor.authorInal, M. T.
dc.contributor.authorMemis, D.
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:50:37Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:50:37Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Prone positioning has been found to improve oxygenation in most patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the prone position in patients with ARDS.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The prone position is one of the ventilator techniques included in recent guidelines for acute respiratory distress syndrome. This study was a retrospective evaluation of the records of 100 ARDS patients who were administered prone position mechanical ventilation in our intensive care unit. All patients were placed in the prone position for a total of 12 hours per day at 4-hour intervals (supine-prone) while admitted to the intensive care unit. RESULTS: This study included 100 participants. These patients were divided into two groups as survivors [(n=38, 16 females, 22 males, median age: 60 (24-86)] and non -survivors [(n=62, 19 females, 43 males, median age: 64 (21-93)], according to their intensive care follow-ups. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, the sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA), and in-flammation markers were statistically significantly higher in the non-survivor group. Between the two groups, there was no statistically signif-icant difference in terms of fundamental characteristics. In the sub-group evaluation of the subjects in patients with ARDS with and with-out novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) groups, the patients in the COVID-19 (+) group were older, had shorter hospital stays, had higher APACHE II and SOFA scores, and higher rates of cardiovascular disease and sepsis.CONCLUSIONS: Applying prone-position mechanical ventilation in the cohorts of our patients with ARDS resulted in a demonstrable significant improvement in the oxygenation levels of our patients.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage9028en_US
dc.identifier.issn1128-3602
dc.identifier.issue19en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37843314en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85175741765en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage9022en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/18071
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001096798300006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVerduci Publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Review For Medical And Pharmacological Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAcute Respiratory Distress Syndromeen_US
dc.subjectProne Positioningen_US
dc.subjectMechanical Ventilationen_US
dc.subjectPositionen_US
dc.titleInvestigation of the effectiveness of prone ventilation in patients followed up for acute respiratory distress syndrome in the intensive care uniten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu