Comparison of cultures immediately incubated intraoperatively with cultures incubated postoperatively in the laboratory for causes of periprosthetic loosening

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorwosidCansü, Eren/A-5595-2018
dc.contributor.authorCansu, Eren
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Aygl Dogan
dc.contributor.authorErdogan, Fahri
dc.contributor.authorBabacan, Muharrem
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:52:33Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:52:33Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentTrakya Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Our study aimed to show whether cultures that are incubated immediately in the operating room (OR) during surgery are superior to those prepared in the laboratory. Patients and Methods: The results of bacteriologic cultures of the specimens processed immediately in the OR during surgery or afterwards in the bacteriology laboratory were compared. Thirty two cases were enrolled in this study. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESR) levels were detected preoperatively. Liquid, swab, and tissue biopsy specimens were obtained to be processed separately in the OR or in the bacteriology laboratory. Each specimen was also examined by Gram-staining. Results: Among 32 cases eight were infected. The average level of CRP was significantly higher in the infected group than in the aseptic group (p=0.003). There was no statistical significance for ESR levels between these groups. Of the eight infected patients, only three specimen out of 42 (7.1%) were Gram-positive. For the specimens processed in the operating room the isolation of the bacteria from liquid specimen cultures was found to be significantly higher than the swab, and tissue biopsy cultures (p<0.001). Conclusion: Statistical analysis showed that the isolation of the bacteria from fluid material was statistically significant (p<0.001). Therefore, we conclude that inoculation of fluid material into the blood culture bottles in the OR may increase the chance of yielding organisms.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5472/MMJ.2014.03280.0
dc.identifier.endpage106en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-9469
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84924964976en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage102en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid161044en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5472/MMJ.2014.03280.0
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/161044
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/18752
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000219999200004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherMarmara Univ, Fac Medicineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMarmara Medical Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectArthroplasty Looseningen_US
dc.subjectIntraoperative Cultureen_US
dc.subjectInfected Looseningen_US
dc.subjectMicrobiological Diagnosisen_US
dc.titleComparison of cultures immediately incubated intraoperatively with cultures incubated postoperatively in the laboratory for causes of periprosthetic looseningen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu