Acknowledged statistical help and a better use of p-values: a proposal
dc.authorid | dincses nas, Elif/0000-0002-7515-9927 | |
dc.authorid | Hatemi, Gulen/0000-0002-1952-1135 | |
dc.authorwosid | Hatemi, Gulen/AFM-7014-2022 | |
dc.authorwosid | Guzelant, Gul/AEV-1919-2022 | |
dc.authorwosid | dincses nas, Elif/JTV-0710-2023 | |
dc.contributor.author | Dincses, E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Guzelant, G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hatemi, G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sut, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yazici, H. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-12T11:13:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-12T11:13:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.department | Trakya Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective. The p-value is commonly misused. We hypothesised that a close cooperation with a statistician would go along with a more proper use of p-values. We considered a close cooperation present, when a statistician was a coauthor, or a formal statistical help was acknowledged in a study report. Methods. Randomised controlled trials published in 2015-16 in 4 widely read rheumatology journals were searched for a close cooperation with a statistician, the inclusion of effect sizes, confidence intervals, exact rather than relative p-values and the omission of p-values in tables depicting trial entry data. Results. There were only 28/133 (21%) articles in which a formal statistical help was acknowledged (Group I). The rest (Group II) gave no acknowledgement of a close cooperation. Reporting of effect sizes (96% vs. 71%) and exact p-values (88% vs. 69%) were more in Group I (p=0.01, and p=0.08, respectively). Conclusion. While a formal acknowledgement of a close cooperation was notably infrequent at 21%, this went along with improvement in some aspects of p-value reporting. If substantiated by further studies, we propose that a formally acknowledged statistical help should improve p-value reporting. Like all professionals, statisticians would like their name/office to be formally associated with their good work. | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 857 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0392-856X | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1593-098X | |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31376247 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 855 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/23451 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 37 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000485817300021 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Clinical & Exper Rheumatology | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical And Experimental Rheumatology | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | P-Value | en_US |
dc.subject | Acknowledged Statistical Help | en_US |
dc.subject | Effect Size | en_US |
dc.subject | Confidence Interval | en_US |
dc.title | Acknowledged statistical help and a better use of p-values: a proposal | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |