Validation of the semi-structured Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS) interview

dc.authorscopusid56088124400
dc.authorscopusid56268272900
dc.contributor.authorÇinar R.K.
dc.contributor.authorSoren O.D.
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T10:25:09Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T10:25:09Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractObjective: Recently, a semi-structured interview dedicated to aid rating on the Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS) was developed. Here, we aimed to validate PDAS ratings collected via this semi-structured interview. Methods: A total of 50 patients with psychotic depression - 34 with unipolar psychotic depression and 16 with bipolar psychotic depression - were recruited for the study. The following aspects of validity were investigated: clinical validity, psychometric validity (scalability), and responsiveness. Results: The PDAS ratings were clinically valid (Spearman's coefficient of correlation between PDAS total scores and Clinical Global Impressions scale - severity of illness ratings=0.66, p<0.001), scalable (Loevinger's coefficient of heterogeneity at endpoint=0.45), and responsive (no participants met the criterion for remission on the PDAS (total score <8) at baseline - at endpoint 74% (95% CI: 60-85) of the participants met this criterion). Conclusions: The semi-structured PDAS interview provides valid ratings of the severity of psychotic depression. © 2017 Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/neu.2017.15
dc.identifier.endpage180en_US
dc.identifier.issn0924-2708
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid28535843en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85019570393en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage175en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2017.15
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/16196
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Neuropsychiatricaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAffective Disorders; Mood Disorders; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; Psychoticen_US
dc.subjectAdult; Article; Bipolar Depression; Clinical Article; Clinical Global Impression Scale; Clinical Validity; Controlled Study; Correlation Coefficient; Depressive Psychosis; Disease Severity; Female; Human; Major Depression; Male; Psychological Rating Scale; Psychometric Validity; Psychometry; Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale; Remission; Responsiveness Validity; Scoring System; Semi Structured Interview; Validation Study; Validity; Affective Psychosis; Bipolar Disorder; Depression; Middle Aged; Psychological Interview; Psychological Rating Scale; Psychosis; Reproducibility; Severity Of Illness Index; Standards; Adult; Affective Disorders, Psychotic; Bipolar Disorder; Depressive Disorder; Female; Humans; Interview, Psychological; Male; Middle Aged; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Reproducibility Of Results; Severity Of Illness Indexen_US
dc.titleValidation of the semi-structured Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS) interviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar