Validation of the semi-structured Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS) interview
dc.authorscopusid | 56088124400 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 56268272900 | |
dc.contributor.author | Çinar R.K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Soren O.D. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-12T10:25:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-12T10:25:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: Recently, a semi-structured interview dedicated to aid rating on the Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS) was developed. Here, we aimed to validate PDAS ratings collected via this semi-structured interview. Methods: A total of 50 patients with psychotic depression - 34 with unipolar psychotic depression and 16 with bipolar psychotic depression - were recruited for the study. The following aspects of validity were investigated: clinical validity, psychometric validity (scalability), and responsiveness. Results: The PDAS ratings were clinically valid (Spearman's coefficient of correlation between PDAS total scores and Clinical Global Impressions scale - severity of illness ratings=0.66, p<0.001), scalable (Loevinger's coefficient of heterogeneity at endpoint=0.45), and responsive (no participants met the criterion for remission on the PDAS (total score <8) at baseline - at endpoint 74% (95% CI: 60-85) of the participants met this criterion). Conclusions: The semi-structured PDAS interview provides valid ratings of the severity of psychotic depression. © 2017 Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/neu.2017.15 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 180 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0924-2708 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 28535843 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85019570393 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 175 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2017.15 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14551/16196 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 30 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Acta Neuropsychiatrica | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Affective Disorders; Mood Disorders; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; Psychotic | en_US |
dc.subject | Adult; Article; Bipolar Depression; Clinical Article; Clinical Global Impression Scale; Clinical Validity; Controlled Study; Correlation Coefficient; Depressive Psychosis; Disease Severity; Female; Human; Major Depression; Male; Psychological Rating Scale; Psychometric Validity; Psychometry; Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale; Remission; Responsiveness Validity; Scoring System; Semi Structured Interview; Validation Study; Validity; Affective Psychosis; Bipolar Disorder; Depression; Middle Aged; Psychological Interview; Psychological Rating Scale; Psychosis; Reproducibility; Severity Of Illness Index; Standards; Adult; Affective Disorders, Psychotic; Bipolar Disorder; Depressive Disorder; Female; Humans; Interview, Psychological; Male; Middle Aged; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychotic Disorders; Reproducibility Of Results; Severity Of Illness Index | en_US |
dc.title | Validation of the semi-structured Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS) interview | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |