Yazar "Senlikci, A." seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Comparison between electronic method and conventional method recording and follow-up of general surgery ward-round notes taken
    (Edizioni Minerva Medica, 2014) Aydin, I.; Yeldan, E.; Ibis, A. C.; Albayrak, D.; Oguz, S.; Senlikci, A.
    Aim. Patient anamneses and ward-rounds notes taken are two key elements which have been and will be used to ensure accurate and reliable sustainability at surgery services. In this study, we aimed to find a new method which is capable of better addressing the needs in this process, simplifying it and also saving time. We also targeted to compare this new method used by us with the method, also known as conventional method, having been used for years. Methods. Thirty patients were included in the study. The prehospitalization anamneses of the patients were taken using the two methods and the durations were recorded separately for the two methods. Thereafter, the patients were visited by two methods in the morning on each day of their stay. The durations were recorded daily and separately for the two methods. The durations were statistically evaluated separately for the anamneses and ward-round notes taken. Results. Evaluations showed that the method using hand terminal (1.2250 minutes) is more advantageous in terms of duration in recording ward-round scores than the conventional method (1.3853 minutes). It was founded that in regard to the duration, the average duration of manual anamnesis taking (16.3350 minutes) is higher than that of taking anamnesis by means of hand terminal (15.4733 minutes). Furthermore, it was also seen that the use of this new technique eliminated the problems previously experienced in data transfer, access to historical data etc. Conclusion. In conclusion, this method that is tested by use of hand terminal is more advantageous than the conventional method in terms of time saving and accurate data transfer. It is our opinion that it will provide advantages in many more aspects if it is worked on.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Risk factors for peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer
    (Edizioni Minerva Medica, 2015) Yeldan, E.; Oguz, S.; Usta, U.; Ilhan, E.; Senlikci, A.
    Aim. Tumor dissemination, lymphnode involvement and surgical resection technique are the most important factors affecting patient prognosis with gastric cancer. Peritoneal dissemination adversely affects the survival rate in patients. Microscopic peritoneal dissemination can be detected with peritoneal lavage cytological examination. Peroperatively detected microscopic peritoneal dissemination changes the treatment plan for patients and can be useful when selecting patients who should undergo adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods. At the Trakya Universtity Faculty of Medicine, General Surgery Department, a 41-year-old patient who was macroscopic peritoneal dissemination during the dates January-December 2011 was included in the study. Perioperative peritoneal lavage was performed and cytological examination of peritoneal aspirate carried out. Using tumor markers the relationship between lymph node metastasis, prognostic type, tumor location and perineural invasion was investigated on the serum and peritoneal fluid. Results. Forty-one patients were operated on; 10 of them (24.4%) had positive malignant cytology and 31 (75.7%) had negative cytology. Just 1 (7.2%) patient was found to have positive cytology out of 13 (31.7%) that did not have serous invasion. Of the 28 (68.3%) patients with serous invasion, 9 patients (32.1%) were found to have positive cytology. No significant pattern was detected in the carcino-embryionic antigen, cancer antigen 19-9 and AFP levels in both the positive and negative cytology serum and peritoneal lavage fluid. Of found to have cardia dissemination and 13 (31.7%) were found to have dissemination located at the corpus. Peritoneal dissemination was found to be significantly high in gastric cancer located in the cardia and corpus. Fourteen (34.1%) of the patients had stage I and stage II cancer and 27 (65.9%) of patient's had cancer in stages III and IV. Just 1 (7.1%) patient with stage I or II cancer was found to have positive malignant cytology, however 9 (33.3%) patient's of stage III and IV gastric cancer patients were tested positively for malignant cytology. Conclusion. A positive relationship was detected in the positive peritoneal cell malignancy with cancer stage, age, invasion depth and tumor location in patients.