Yazar "Sendur, Mehmet A. N." seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor for survival in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (Turkish Oncology Group Study)(Sage Publications Ltd, 2020) Hizal, Mutlu; Sendur, Mehmet A. N.; Yasar, Hatime Arzu; Bir Yucel, Kadriye; Arslan, Cagatay; Ucar, Gokhan; Karakaya, SerdarBackground To describe the prognostic value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and its effect on survival in in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 331 patients. The cut-off value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio was specified as 3 which is mostly close-and also clinically easily applicable-to the median neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio level of our study group. High group is identified as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio >3 (n = 160) and low group is identified as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio <= 3 (n = 163). Results A total of 331 (with 211 male and 120 female) patients were enrolled to study. The median age of the patients was 58. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk score is calculated for the 72.8% (n = 241) of the study group and among these patients, favorable, intermediate, and poor risk rates were 22, 45.2, and 32.8%. The total usage of tyrosine kinase inhibitors reached 78% of the patients. The median overall survival was 32 months versus 11 months in the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio low and high groups, respectively (HR: 0.49 (95% CI 0.37-0.65), p < 0.001). Conclusion In conclusion, the pre-treatment value of elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio might be a predictor of poor overall survival in advanced renal cell carcinoma patients.Öğe Pembrolizumab Plus Ipilimumab or Placebo for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score ? 50%: Randomized, Double-Blind Phase III KEYNOTE-598 Study(Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2021) Boyer, Michael; Sendur, Mehmet A. N.; Rodriguez-Abreu, Delvys; Park, Keunchil; Lee, Dae Ho; Cicin, Irfan; Yumuk, Perran FuldenPURPOSE Pembrolizumab monotherapy is standard first-line therapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) >= 50% without actionable driver mutations. It is not known whether adding ipilimumab to pembrolizumab improves efficacy over pembrolizumab alone in this population. METHODS In the randomized, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-598 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ), eligible patients with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS >= 50% and no sensitizing EGFR or ALK aberrations were randomly allocated 1:1 to ipilimumab 1 mg/kg or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 18 doses; all participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 35 doses. Primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival. RESULTS Of the 568 participants, 284 were randomly allocated to each group. Median overall survival was 21.4 months for pembrolizumab-ipilimumab versus 21.9 months for pembrolizumab-placebo (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.37; P = .74). Median progression-free survival was 8.2 months for pembrolizumab-ipilimumab versus 8.4 months for pembrolizumab-placebo (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.30; P = .72). Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 62.4% of pembrolizumab-ipilimumab recipients versus 50.2% of pembrolizumab-placebo recipients and led to death in 13.1% versus 7.5%. The external data and safety monitoring committee recommended that the study be stopped for futility and that participants discontinue ipilimumab and placebo. CONCLUSION Adding ipilimumab to pembrolizumab does not improve efficacy and is associated with greater toxicity than pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS >= 50% and no targetable EGFR or ALK aberrations. These data do not support use of pembrolizumab-ipilimumab in place of pembrolizumab monotherapy in this population. (C) 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology